Randomized controlled trial · Curr Clin Pharmacol · 2017. Source record refreshed; an explanation has not been reviewed.
Randomized controlled trial2017
About this paper +
This page identifies the publication and its source. A checked explanation of its findings is not yet available.
Keep in mind: Checking bibliographic metadata does not verify a study’s conclusions or any advice previously linked to it.
Study details & source ↗
Paper record
✓ Read
Meta-analysis · Biomed Res Int · 2017. Source record refreshed; an explanation has not been reviewed.
Meta-analysis2017
About this paper +
This page identifies the publication and its source. A checked explanation of its findings is not yet available.
Keep in mind: Checking bibliographic metadata does not verify a study’s conclusions or any advice previously linked to it.
Study details & source ↗
Paper record
✓ Read
Randomized controlled trial · BMC Complement Altern Med · 2017. Source record refreshed; an explanation has not been reviewed.
Randomized controlled trial2017
About this paper +
This page identifies the publication and its source. A checked explanation of its findings is not yet available.
Keep in mind: Checking bibliographic metadata does not verify a study’s conclusions or any advice previously linked to it.
Study details & source ↗
Paper record
✓ Read
Meta-analysis · Clin Cardiol · 2017. Source record refreshed; an explanation has not been reviewed.
Meta-analysis2017
About this paper +
This page identifies the publication and its source. A checked explanation of its findings is not yet available.
Keep in mind: Checking bibliographic metadata does not verify a study’s conclusions or any advice previously linked to it.
Study details & source ↗
Paper record
✓ Read
Study design not specified in the source record · Sci Rep · 2017. Source record refreshed; an explanation has not been reviewed.
Study design not specified in the source record2017
About this paper +
This page identifies the publication and its source. A checked explanation of its findings is not yet available.
Keep in mind: Checking bibliographic metadata does not verify a study’s conclusions or any advice previously linked to it.
Study details & source ↗
Paper record
✓ Read
Cohort study (title) · Kidney Int Rep · 2017. Source record refreshed; an explanation has not been reviewed.
Cohort study (title)2017
About this paper +
This page identifies the publication and its source. A checked explanation of its findings is not yet available.
Keep in mind: Checking bibliographic metadata does not verify a study’s conclusions or any advice previously linked to it.
Study details & source ↗
Paper record
✓ Read
Published Erratum · Sci Rep · 2017. Source record refreshed; an explanation has not been reviewed.
Published Erratum2017
About this paper +
This page identifies the publication and its source. A checked explanation of its findings is not yet available.
Keep in mind: Checking bibliographic metadata does not verify a study’s conclusions or any advice previously linked to it.
Study details & source ↗
Paper record
✓ Read
This source has an expression of concern. Its findings need additional review.
Study design not specified in the source record2017
About this paper +
The current PubMed record links an expression of concern. No practical takeaway is approved here.
Keep in mind: Checking bibliographic metadata does not verify a study’s conclusions or any advice previously linked to it.
Study details & source ↗
Paper record
✓ Read
Randomized controlled trial · BMC Vet Res · 2017. Source record refreshed; an explanation has not been reviewed.
Randomized controlled trial2017
About this paper +
This page identifies the publication and its source. A checked explanation of its findings is not yet available.
Keep in mind: Checking bibliographic metadata does not verify a study’s conclusions or any advice previously linked to it.
Study details & source ↗
Paper record
✓ Read
Randomized controlled trial · Magnes Res · 2017. Source record refreshed; an explanation has not been reviewed.
Randomized controlled trial2017
About this paper +
This page identifies the publication and its source. A checked explanation of its findings is not yet available.
Keep in mind: Checking bibliographic metadata does not verify a study’s conclusions or any advice previously linked to it.
Study details & source ↗
Paper record
✓ Read
Randomized controlled trial · Nutr Diabetes · 2017. Source record refreshed; an explanation has not been reviewed.
Randomized controlled trial2017
About this paper +
This page identifies the publication and its source. A checked explanation of its findings is not yet available.
Keep in mind: Checking bibliographic metadata does not verify a study’s conclusions or any advice previously linked to it.
Study details & source ↗
Paper record
✓ Read
Meta-analysis · Lancet Public Health · 2017. Source record refreshed; an explanation has not been reviewed.
Meta-analysis2017
About this paper +
This page identifies the publication and its source. A checked explanation of its findings is not yet available.
Keep in mind: Checking bibliographic metadata does not verify a study’s conclusions or any advice previously linked to it.
Study details & source ↗
Paper record
✓ Read
Systematic review · Lancet Public Health · 2017. Source record refreshed; an explanation has not been reviewed.
Systematic review2017
About this paper +
This page identifies the publication and its source. A checked explanation of its findings is not yet available.
Keep in mind: Checking bibliographic metadata does not verify a study’s conclusions or any advice previously linked to it.
Study details & source ↗
Paper record
✓ Read
Randomized controlled trial · Nutrients · 2017. Source record refreshed; an explanation has not been reviewed.
Randomized controlled trial2017
About this paper +
This page identifies the publication and its source. A checked explanation of its findings is not yet available.
Keep in mind: Checking bibliographic metadata does not verify a study’s conclusions or any advice previously linked to it.
Study details & source ↗
Paper record
✓ Read
Randomized controlled trial · J Bone Miner Res · 2017. Source record refreshed; an explanation has not been reviewed.
Randomized controlled trial2017
About this paper +
This page identifies the publication and its source. A checked explanation of its findings is not yet available.
Keep in mind: Checking bibliographic metadata does not verify a study’s conclusions or any advice previously linked to it.
Study details & source ↗
Paper record
✓ Read
Systematic review · Obes Facts · 2017. Source record refreshed; an explanation has not been reviewed.
Systematic review2017
About this paper +
This page identifies the publication and its source. A checked explanation of its findings is not yet available.
Keep in mind: Checking bibliographic metadata does not verify a study’s conclusions or any advice previously linked to it.
Study details & source ↗
Paper record
✓ Read
Meta-analysis · Nutrients · 2017. Source record refreshed; an explanation has not been reviewed.
Meta-analysis2017
About this paper +
This page identifies the publication and its source. A checked explanation of its findings is not yet available.
Keep in mind: Checking bibliographic metadata does not verify a study’s conclusions or any advice previously linked to it.
Study details & source ↗
Paper record
✓ Read
Study design not specified in the source record · BMC Public Health · 2017. Source record refreshed; an explanation has not been reviewed.
Study design not specified in the source record2017
About this paper +
This page identifies the publication and its source. A checked explanation of its findings is not yet available.
Keep in mind: Checking bibliographic metadata does not verify a study’s conclusions or any advice previously linked to it.
Study details & source ↗
Paper record
✓ Read
Randomized controlled trial · Nutr Health · 2017. Source record refreshed; an explanation has not been reviewed.
Randomized controlled trial2017
About this paper +
This page identifies the publication and its source. A checked explanation of its findings is not yet available.
Keep in mind: Checking bibliographic metadata does not verify a study’s conclusions or any advice previously linked to it.
Study details & source ↗
Paper record
✓ Read
Clinical trial · PLoS One · 2017. Source record refreshed; an explanation has not been reviewed.
Clinical trial2017
About this paper +
This page identifies the publication and its source. A checked explanation of its findings is not yet available.
Keep in mind: Checking bibliographic metadata does not verify a study’s conclusions or any advice previously linked to it.
Study details & source ↗
Paper record
✓ Read
Randomized controlled trial · J Int Soc Sports Nutr · 2017. Source record refreshed; an explanation has not been reviewed.
Randomized controlled trial2017
About this paper +
This page identifies the publication and its source. A checked explanation of its findings is not yet available.
Keep in mind: Checking bibliographic metadata does not verify a study’s conclusions or any advice previously linked to it.
Study details & source ↗
Paper record
✓ Read
Study design not specified in the source record · Brain Behav · 2017. Source record refreshed; an explanation has not been reviewed.
Study design not specified in the source record2017
About this paper +
This page identifies the publication and its source. A checked explanation of its findings is not yet available.
Keep in mind: Checking bibliographic metadata does not verify a study’s conclusions or any advice previously linked to it.
Study details & source ↗
Paper record
✓ Read
Randomized controlled trial · Int J Med Mushrooms · 2017. Source record refreshed; an explanation has not been reviewed.
Randomized controlled trial2017
About this paper +
This page identifies the publication and its source. A checked explanation of its findings is not yet available.
Keep in mind: Checking bibliographic metadata does not verify a study’s conclusions or any advice previously linked to it.
Study details & source ↗
Paper record
✓ Read
Meta-analysis · J Nutr Health Aging · 2017. Source record refreshed; an explanation has not been reviewed.
Meta-analysis2017
About this paper +
This page identifies the publication and its source. A checked explanation of its findings is not yet available.
Keep in mind: Checking bibliographic metadata does not verify a study’s conclusions or any advice previously linked to it.
Study details & source ↗
Paper record
✓ Read