Meta-analysis · Oncotarget · 2016. Source record refreshed; an explanation has not been reviewed.
Meta-analysis2016
About this paper +
This page identifies the publication and its source. A checked explanation of its findings is not yet available.
Keep in mind: Checking bibliographic metadata does not verify a study’s conclusions or any advice previously linked to it.
Study details & source ↗
Paper record
✓ Read
Meta-analysis · Surg Oncol · 2016. Source record refreshed; an explanation has not been reviewed.
Meta-analysis2016
About this paper +
This page identifies the publication and its source. A checked explanation of its findings is not yet available.
Keep in mind: Checking bibliographic metadata does not verify a study’s conclusions or any advice previously linked to it.
Study details & source ↗
Paper record
✓ Read
Systematic review · Neurosci Biobehav Rev · 2016. Source record refreshed; an explanation has not been reviewed.
Systematic review2016
About this paper +
This page identifies the publication and its source. A checked explanation of its findings is not yet available.
Keep in mind: Checking bibliographic metadata does not verify a study’s conclusions or any advice previously linked to it.
Study details & source ↗
Paper record
✓ Read
Meta-analysis · Medicine (Baltimore) · 2016. Source record refreshed; an explanation has not been reviewed.
Meta-analysis2016
About this paper +
This page identifies the publication and its source. A checked explanation of its findings is not yet available.
Keep in mind: Checking bibliographic metadata does not verify a study’s conclusions or any advice previously linked to it.
Study details & source ↗
Paper record
✓ Read
Randomized controlled trial · J Nutr Gerontol Geriatr · 2016. Source record refreshed; an explanation has not been reviewed.
Randomized controlled trial2016
About this paper +
This page identifies the publication and its source. A checked explanation of its findings is not yet available.
Keep in mind: Checking bibliographic metadata does not verify a study’s conclusions or any advice previously linked to it.
Study details & source ↗
Paper record
✓ Read
Study design not specified in the source record · Indian Dermatol Online J · 2016. Source record refreshed; an explanation has not been reviewed.
Study design not specified in the source record2016
About this paper +
This page identifies the publication and its source. A checked explanation of its findings is not yet available.
Keep in mind: Checking bibliographic metadata does not verify a study’s conclusions or any advice previously linked to it.
Study details & source ↗
Paper record
✓ Read
Randomized controlled trial · Int J Sports Med · 2016. Source record refreshed; an explanation has not been reviewed.
Randomized controlled trial2016
About this paper +
This page identifies the publication and its source. A checked explanation of its findings is not yet available.
Keep in mind: Checking bibliographic metadata does not verify a study’s conclusions or any advice previously linked to it.
Study details & source ↗
Paper record
✓ Read
Randomized controlled trial · Eur J Paediatr Neurol · 2016. Source record refreshed; an explanation has not been reviewed.
Randomized controlled trial2016
About this paper +
This page identifies the publication and its source. A checked explanation of its findings is not yet available.
Keep in mind: Checking bibliographic metadata does not verify a study’s conclusions or any advice previously linked to it.
Study details & source ↗
Paper record
✓ Read
Randomized controlled trial · BMC Neurol · 2016. Source record refreshed; an explanation has not been reviewed.
Randomized controlled trial2016
About this paper +
This page identifies the publication and its source. A checked explanation of its findings is not yet available.
Keep in mind: Checking bibliographic metadata does not verify a study’s conclusions or any advice previously linked to it.
Study details & source ↗
Paper record
✓ Read
Randomized controlled trial · Am J Public Health · 2016. Source record refreshed; an explanation has not been reviewed.
Randomized controlled trial2016
About this paper +
This page identifies the publication and its source. A checked explanation of its findings is not yet available.
Keep in mind: Checking bibliographic metadata does not verify a study’s conclusions or any advice previously linked to it.
Study details & source ↗
Paper record
✓ Read
Systematic review · World J Gastroenterol · 2016. Source record refreshed; an explanation has not been reviewed.
Systematic review2016
About this paper +
This page identifies the publication and its source. A checked explanation of its findings is not yet available.
Keep in mind: Checking bibliographic metadata does not verify a study’s conclusions or any advice previously linked to it.
Study details & source ↗
Paper record
✓ Read
Meta-analysis · J Affect Disord · 2016. Source record refreshed; an explanation has not been reviewed.
Meta-analysis2016
About this paper +
This page identifies the publication and its source. A checked explanation of its findings is not yet available.
Keep in mind: Checking bibliographic metadata does not verify a study’s conclusions or any advice previously linked to it.
Study details & source ↗
Paper record
✓ Read
Meta-analysis · Crit Care · 2016. Source record refreshed; an explanation has not been reviewed.
Meta-analysis2016
About this paper +
This page identifies the publication and its source. A checked explanation of its findings is not yet available.
Keep in mind: Checking bibliographic metadata does not verify a study’s conclusions or any advice previously linked to it.
Study details & source ↗
Paper record
✓ Read
Randomized controlled trial · BMC Complement Altern Med · 2016. Source record refreshed; an explanation has not been reviewed.
Randomized controlled trial2016
About this paper +
This page identifies the publication and its source. A checked explanation of its findings is not yet available.
Keep in mind: Checking bibliographic metadata does not verify a study’s conclusions or any advice previously linked to it.
Study details & source ↗
Paper record
✓ Read
Meta-analysis · Medicine (Baltimore) · 2016. Source record refreshed; an explanation has not been reviewed.
Meta-analysis2016
About this paper +
This page identifies the publication and its source. A checked explanation of its findings is not yet available.
Keep in mind: Checking bibliographic metadata does not verify a study’s conclusions or any advice previously linked to it.
Study details & source ↗
Paper record
✓ Read
Study design not specified in the source record · Dement Geriatr Cogn Disord · 2016. Source record refreshed; an explanation has not been reviewed.
Study design not specified in the source record2016
About this paper +
This page identifies the publication and its source. A checked explanation of its findings is not yet available.
Keep in mind: Checking bibliographic metadata does not verify a study’s conclusions or any advice previously linked to it.
Study details & source ↗
Paper record
✓ Read
Randomized controlled trial · Int J Mol Sci · 2016. Source record refreshed; an explanation has not been reviewed.
Randomized controlled trial2016
About this paper +
This page identifies the publication and its source. A checked explanation of its findings is not yet available.
Keep in mind: Checking bibliographic metadata does not verify a study’s conclusions or any advice previously linked to it.
Study details & source ↗
Paper record
✓ Read
Meta-analysis · Cochrane Database Syst Rev · 2016. Source record refreshed; an explanation has not been reviewed.
Meta-analysis2016
About this paper +
This page identifies the publication and its source. A checked explanation of its findings is not yet available.
Keep in mind: Checking bibliographic metadata does not verify a study’s conclusions or any advice previously linked to it.
Study details & source ↗
Paper record
✓ Read
Randomized controlled trial · Exp Gerontol · 2016. Source record refreshed; an explanation has not been reviewed.
Randomized controlled trial2016
About this paper +
This page identifies the publication and its source. A checked explanation of its findings is not yet available.
Keep in mind: Checking bibliographic metadata does not verify a study’s conclusions or any advice previously linked to it.
Study details & source ↗
Paper record
✓ Read
Randomized controlled trial · Br J Nutr · 2016. Source record refreshed; an explanation has not been reviewed.
Randomized controlled trial2016
About this paper +
This page identifies the publication and its source. A checked explanation of its findings is not yet available.
Keep in mind: Checking bibliographic metadata does not verify a study’s conclusions or any advice previously linked to it.
Study details & source ↗
Paper record
✓ Read
Randomized controlled trial · Nutrients · 2016. Source record refreshed; an explanation has not been reviewed.
Randomized controlled trial2016
About this paper +
This page identifies the publication and its source. A checked explanation of its findings is not yet available.
Keep in mind: Checking bibliographic metadata does not verify a study’s conclusions or any advice previously linked to it.
Study details & source ↗
Paper record
✓ Read
Randomized controlled trial · BMC Public Health · 2016. Source record refreshed; an explanation has not been reviewed.
Randomized controlled trial2016
About this paper +
This page identifies the publication and its source. A checked explanation of its findings is not yet available.
Keep in mind: Checking bibliographic metadata does not verify a study’s conclusions or any advice previously linked to it.
Study details & source ↗
Paper record
✓ Read
Meta-analysis · Nutrients · 2016. Source record refreshed; an explanation has not been reviewed.
Meta-analysis2016
About this paper +
This page identifies the publication and its source. A checked explanation of its findings is not yet available.
Keep in mind: Checking bibliographic metadata does not verify a study’s conclusions or any advice previously linked to it.
Study details & source ↗
Paper record
✓ Read
Meta-analysis · PLoS One · 2016. Source record refreshed; an explanation has not been reviewed.
Meta-analysis2016
About this paper +
This page identifies the publication and its source. A checked explanation of its findings is not yet available.
Keep in mind: Checking bibliographic metadata does not verify a study’s conclusions or any advice previously linked to it.
Study details & source ↗
Paper record
✓ Read