Randomized controlled trial · Photochem Photobiol · 2015. Source record refreshed; an explanation has not been reviewed.
Randomized controlled trial2015
About this paper +
This page identifies the publication and its source. A checked explanation of its findings is not yet available.
Keep in mind: Checking bibliographic metadata does not verify a study’s conclusions or any advice previously linked to it.
Study details & source ↗
Paper record
✓ Read
Meta-analysis · Tumour Biol · 2015. Source record refreshed; an explanation has not been reviewed.
Meta-analysis2015
About this paper +
This page identifies the publication and its source. A checked explanation of its findings is not yet available.
Keep in mind: Checking bibliographic metadata does not verify a study’s conclusions or any advice previously linked to it.
Study details & source ↗
Paper record
✓ Read
This publication is retracted. Read the source notice before using its findings.
Randomized controlled trial2015
About this paper +
The current PubMed record links a retraction. This catalog does not present the publication as reliable practical guidance.
Keep in mind: Checking bibliographic metadata does not verify a study’s conclusions or any advice previously linked to it.
Study details & source ↗
Retracted paper
✓ Read
Randomized controlled trial · J Med Food · 2015. Source record refreshed; an explanation has not been reviewed.
Randomized controlled trial2015
About this paper +
This page identifies the publication and its source. A checked explanation of its findings is not yet available.
Keep in mind: Checking bibliographic metadata does not verify a study’s conclusions or any advice previously linked to it.
Study details & source ↗
Paper record
✓ Read
Randomized controlled trial · Int J Obes (Lond) · 2015. Source record refreshed; an explanation has not been reviewed.
Randomized controlled trial2015
About this paper +
This page identifies the publication and its source. A checked explanation of its findings is not yet available.
Keep in mind: Checking bibliographic metadata does not verify a study’s conclusions or any advice previously linked to it.
Study details & source ↗
Paper record
✓ Read
Randomized controlled trial · J Sports Med Phys Fitness · 2015. Source record refreshed; an explanation has not been reviewed.
Randomized controlled trial2015
About this paper +
This page identifies the publication and its source. A checked explanation of its findings is not yet available.
Keep in mind: Checking bibliographic metadata does not verify a study’s conclusions or any advice previously linked to it.
Study details & source ↗
Paper record
✓ Read
Meta-analysis · Mol Psychiatry · 2015. Source record refreshed; an explanation has not been reviewed.
Meta-analysis2015
About this paper +
This page identifies the publication and its source. A checked explanation of its findings is not yet available.
Keep in mind: Checking bibliographic metadata does not verify a study’s conclusions or any advice previously linked to it.
Study details & source ↗
Paper record
✓ Read
Study design not specified in the source record · Skin Pharmacol Physiol · 2015. Source record refreshed; an explanation has not been reviewed.
Study design not specified in the source record2015
About this paper +
This page identifies the publication and its source. A checked explanation of its findings is not yet available.
Keep in mind: Checking bibliographic metadata does not verify a study’s conclusions or any advice previously linked to it.
Study details & source ↗
Paper record
✓ Read
Randomized controlled trial · J Psychopharmacol · 2015. Source record refreshed; an explanation has not been reviewed.
Randomized controlled trial2015
About this paper +
This page identifies the publication and its source. A checked explanation of its findings is not yet available.
Keep in mind: Checking bibliographic metadata does not verify a study’s conclusions or any advice previously linked to it.
Study details & source ↗
Paper record
✓ Read
Systematic review · J Altern Complement Med · 2015. Source record refreshed; an explanation has not been reviewed.
Systematic review2015
About this paper +
This page identifies the publication and its source. A checked explanation of its findings is not yet available.
Keep in mind: Checking bibliographic metadata does not verify a study’s conclusions or any advice previously linked to it.
Study details & source ↗
Paper record
✓ Read
Systematic review · Vasc Med · 2015. Source record refreshed; an explanation has not been reviewed.
Systematic review2015
About this paper +
This page identifies the publication and its source. A checked explanation of its findings is not yet available.
Keep in mind: Checking bibliographic metadata does not verify a study’s conclusions or any advice previously linked to it.
Study details & source ↗
Paper record
✓ Read
Randomized controlled trial · Drug Res (Stuttg) · 2015. Source record refreshed; an explanation has not been reviewed.
Randomized controlled trial2015
About this paper +
This page identifies the publication and its source. A checked explanation of its findings is not yet available.
Keep in mind: Checking bibliographic metadata does not verify a study’s conclusions or any advice previously linked to it.
Study details & source ↗
Paper record
✓ Read
Study design not specified in the source record · Eur Urol · 2015. Source record refreshed; an explanation has not been reviewed.
Study design not specified in the source record2015
About this paper +
This page identifies the publication and its source. A checked explanation of its findings is not yet available.
Keep in mind: Checking bibliographic metadata does not verify a study’s conclusions or any advice previously linked to it.
Study details & source ↗
Paper record
✓ Read
Meta-analysis · Am J Hypertens · 2015. Source record refreshed; an explanation has not been reviewed.
Meta-analysis2015
About this paper +
This page identifies the publication and its source. A checked explanation of its findings is not yet available.
Keep in mind: Checking bibliographic metadata does not verify a study’s conclusions or any advice previously linked to it.
Study details & source ↗
Paper record
✓ Read
Randomized controlled trial · J Am Med Dir Assoc · 2015. Source record refreshed; an explanation has not been reviewed.
Randomized controlled trial2015
About this paper +
This page identifies the publication and its source. A checked explanation of its findings is not yet available.
Keep in mind: Checking bibliographic metadata does not verify a study’s conclusions or any advice previously linked to it.
Study details & source ↗
Paper record
✓ Read
Meta-analysis · Eur J Prev Cardiol · 2015. Source record refreshed; an explanation has not been reviewed.
Meta-analysis2015
About this paper +
This page identifies the publication and its source. A checked explanation of its findings is not yet available.
Keep in mind: Checking bibliographic metadata does not verify a study’s conclusions or any advice previously linked to it.
Study details & source ↗
Paper record
✓ Read
Systematic review · Sports Med · 2015. Source record refreshed; an explanation has not been reviewed.
Systematic review2015
About this paper +
This page identifies the publication and its source. A checked explanation of its findings is not yet available.
Keep in mind: Checking bibliographic metadata does not verify a study’s conclusions or any advice previously linked to it.
Study details & source ↗
Paper record
✓ Read
Meta-analysis · Eur J Cancer Prev · 2015. Source record refreshed; an explanation has not been reviewed.
Meta-analysis2015
About this paper +
This page identifies the publication and its source. A checked explanation of its findings is not yet available.
Keep in mind: Checking bibliographic metadata does not verify a study’s conclusions or any advice previously linked to it.
Study details & source ↗
Paper record
✓ Read
Clinical trial · Ther Drug Monit · 2015. Source record refreshed; an explanation has not been reviewed.
Clinical trial2015
About this paper +
This page identifies the publication and its source. A checked explanation of its findings is not yet available.
Keep in mind: Checking bibliographic metadata does not verify a study’s conclusions or any advice previously linked to it.
Study details & source ↗
Paper record
✓ Read
Meta-analysis · Leuk Lymphoma · 2015. Source record refreshed; an explanation has not been reviewed.
Meta-analysis2015
About this paper +
This page identifies the publication and its source. A checked explanation of its findings is not yet available.
Keep in mind: Checking bibliographic metadata does not verify a study’s conclusions or any advice previously linked to it.
Study details & source ↗
Paper record
✓ Read
Randomized controlled trial · Hemodial Int · 2015. Source record refreshed; an explanation has not been reviewed.
Randomized controlled trial2015
About this paper +
This page identifies the publication and its source. A checked explanation of its findings is not yet available.
Keep in mind: Checking bibliographic metadata does not verify a study’s conclusions or any advice previously linked to it.
Study details & source ↗
Paper record
✓ Read
Randomized controlled trial · Clin Nutr · 2015. Source record refreshed; an explanation has not been reviewed.
Randomized controlled trial2015
About this paper +
This page identifies the publication and its source. A checked explanation of its findings is not yet available.
Keep in mind: Checking bibliographic metadata does not verify a study’s conclusions or any advice previously linked to it.
Study details & source ↗
Paper record
✓ Read
Randomized controlled trial · Dig Dis Sci · 2015. Source record refreshed; an explanation has not been reviewed.
Randomized controlled trial2015
About this paper +
This page identifies the publication and its source. A checked explanation of its findings is not yet available.
Keep in mind: Checking bibliographic metadata does not verify a study’s conclusions or any advice previously linked to it.
Study details & source ↗
Paper record
✓ Read
Meta-analysis · Public Health Nutr · 2015. Source record refreshed; an explanation has not been reviewed.
Meta-analysis2015
About this paper +
This page identifies the publication and its source. A checked explanation of its findings is not yet available.
Keep in mind: Checking bibliographic metadata does not verify a study’s conclusions or any advice previously linked to it.
Study details & source ↗
Paper record
✓ Read