Randomized controlled trial · J Strength Cond Res · 2005. Source record refreshed; an explanation has not been reviewed.
Randomized controlled trial2005
About this paper +
This page identifies the publication and its source. A checked explanation of its findings is not yet available.
Keep in mind: Checking bibliographic metadata does not verify a study’s conclusions or any advice previously linked to it.
Study details & source ↗
Paper record
✓ Read
Randomized controlled trial · Am J Ther · 2005. Source record refreshed; an explanation has not been reviewed.
Randomized controlled trial2005
About this paper +
This page identifies the publication and its source. A checked explanation of its findings is not yet available.
Keep in mind: Checking bibliographic metadata does not verify a study’s conclusions or any advice previously linked to it.
Study details & source ↗
Paper record
✓ Read
Randomized controlled trial · Am J Clin Nutr · 2005. Source record refreshed; an explanation has not been reviewed.
Randomized controlled trial2005
About this paper +
This page identifies the publication and its source. A checked explanation of its findings is not yet available.
Keep in mind: Checking bibliographic metadata does not verify a study’s conclusions or any advice previously linked to it.
Study details & source ↗
Paper record
✓ Read
Review · J Clin Psychiatry · 2005. Source record refreshed; an explanation has not been reviewed.
Review2005
About this paper +
This page identifies the publication and its source. A checked explanation of its findings is not yet available.
Keep in mind: Checking bibliographic metadata does not verify a study’s conclusions or any advice previously linked to it.
Study details & source ↗
Paper record
✓ Read
Clinical trial · Eur J Clin Nutr · 2005. Source record refreshed; an explanation has not been reviewed.
Clinical trial2005
About this paper +
This page identifies the publication and its source. A checked explanation of its findings is not yet available.
Keep in mind: Checking bibliographic metadata does not verify a study’s conclusions or any advice previously linked to it.
Study details & source ↗
Paper record
✓ Read
Systematic review · Nihon Ronen Igakkai Zasshi · 2005. Source record refreshed; an explanation has not been reviewed.
Systematic review2005
About this paper +
This page identifies the publication and its source. A checked explanation of its findings is not yet available.
Keep in mind: Checking bibliographic metadata does not verify a study’s conclusions or any advice previously linked to it.
Study details & source ↗
Paper record
✓ Read
Randomized controlled trial · J Geriatr Phys Ther · 2005. Source record refreshed; an explanation has not been reviewed.
Randomized controlled trial2005
About this paper +
This page identifies the publication and its source. A checked explanation of its findings is not yet available.
Keep in mind: Checking bibliographic metadata does not verify a study’s conclusions or any advice previously linked to it.
Study details & source ↗
Paper record
✓ Read
Study design not specified in the source record · Aviat Space Environ Med · 2005. Source record refreshed; an explanation has not been reviewed.
Study design not specified in the source record2005
About this paper +
This page identifies the publication and its source. A checked explanation of its findings is not yet available.
Keep in mind: Checking bibliographic metadata does not verify a study’s conclusions or any advice previously linked to it.
Study details & source ↗
Paper record
✓ Read
Systematic review · Cochrane Database Syst Rev · 2005. Source record refreshed; an explanation has not been reviewed.
Systematic review2005
About this paper +
This page identifies the publication and its source. A checked explanation of its findings is not yet available.
Keep in mind: Checking bibliographic metadata does not verify a study’s conclusions or any advice previously linked to it.
Study details & source ↗
Paper record
✓ Read
Meta-analysis · Cochrane Database Syst Rev · 2005. Source record refreshed; an explanation has not been reviewed.
Meta-analysis2005
About this paper +
This page identifies the publication and its source. A checked explanation of its findings is not yet available.
Keep in mind: Checking bibliographic metadata does not verify a study’s conclusions or any advice previously linked to it.
Study details & source ↗
Paper record
✓ Read
Meta-analysis · Ann Pharmacother · 2005. Source record refreshed; an explanation has not been reviewed.
Meta-analysis2005
About this paper +
This page identifies the publication and its source. A checked explanation of its findings is not yet available.
Keep in mind: Checking bibliographic metadata does not verify a study’s conclusions or any advice previously linked to it.
Study details & source ↗
Paper record
✓ Read
Randomized controlled trial · J Nutr Health Aging · 2005. Source record refreshed; an explanation has not been reviewed.
Randomized controlled trial2005
About this paper +
This page identifies the publication and its source. A checked explanation of its findings is not yet available.
Keep in mind: Checking bibliographic metadata does not verify a study’s conclusions or any advice previously linked to it.
Study details & source ↗
Paper record
✓ Read
Clinical trial · J Healthc Qual · 2005. Source record refreshed; an explanation has not been reviewed.
Clinical trial2005
About this paper +
This page identifies the publication and its source. A checked explanation of its findings is not yet available.
Keep in mind: Checking bibliographic metadata does not verify a study’s conclusions or any advice previously linked to it.
Study details & source ↗
Paper record
✓ Read
Randomized controlled trial · Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod · 2005. Source record refreshed; an explanation has not been reviewed.
Randomized controlled trial2005
About this paper +
This page identifies the publication and its source. A checked explanation of its findings is not yet available.
Keep in mind: Checking bibliographic metadata does not verify a study’s conclusions or any advice previously linked to it.
Study details & source ↗
Paper record
✓ Read
Randomized controlled trial · Pediatrics · 2005. Source record refreshed; an explanation has not been reviewed.
Randomized controlled trial2005
About this paper +
This page identifies the publication and its source. A checked explanation of its findings is not yet available.
Keep in mind: Checking bibliographic metadata does not verify a study’s conclusions or any advice previously linked to it.
Study details & source ↗
Paper record
✓ Read
Randomized controlled trial · Ophthalmology · 2005. Source record refreshed; an explanation has not been reviewed.
Randomized controlled trial2005
About this paper +
This page identifies the publication and its source. A checked explanation of its findings is not yet available.
Keep in mind: Checking bibliographic metadata does not verify a study’s conclusions or any advice previously linked to it.
Study details & source ↗
Paper record
✓ Read
Randomized controlled trial · J Aging Phys Act · 2005. Source record refreshed; an explanation has not been reviewed.
Randomized controlled trial2005
About this paper +
This page identifies the publication and its source. A checked explanation of its findings is not yet available.
Keep in mind: Checking bibliographic metadata does not verify a study’s conclusions or any advice previously linked to it.
Study details & source ↗
Paper record
✓ Read
Randomized controlled trial · Diabetes Care · 2005. Source record refreshed; an explanation has not been reviewed.
Randomized controlled trial2005
About this paper +
This page identifies the publication and its source. A checked explanation of its findings is not yet available.
Keep in mind: Checking bibliographic metadata does not verify a study’s conclusions or any advice previously linked to it.
Study details & source ↗
Paper record
✓ Read
Randomized controlled trial · Neurogastroenterol Motil · 2005. Source record refreshed; an explanation has not been reviewed.
Randomized controlled trial2005
About this paper +
This page identifies the publication and its source. A checked explanation of its findings is not yet available.
Keep in mind: Checking bibliographic metadata does not verify a study’s conclusions or any advice previously linked to it.
Study details & source ↗
Paper record
✓ Read
Study design not specified in the source record · J Invest Dermatol · 2005. Source record refreshed; an explanation has not been reviewed.
Study design not specified in the source record2005
About this paper +
This page identifies the publication and its source. A checked explanation of its findings is not yet available.
Keep in mind: Checking bibliographic metadata does not verify a study’s conclusions or any advice previously linked to it.
Study details & source ↗
Paper record
✓ Read
Clinical trial · J Pain Symptom Manage · 2005. Source record refreshed; an explanation has not been reviewed.
Clinical trial2005
About this paper +
This page identifies the publication and its source. A checked explanation of its findings is not yet available.
Keep in mind: Checking bibliographic metadata does not verify a study’s conclusions or any advice previously linked to it.
Study details & source ↗
Paper record
✓ Read
Randomized controlled trial · Perspectives · 2005. Source record refreshed; an explanation has not been reviewed.
Randomized controlled trial2005
About this paper +
This page identifies the publication and its source. A checked explanation of its findings is not yet available.
Keep in mind: Checking bibliographic metadata does not verify a study’s conclusions or any advice previously linked to it.
Study details & source ↗
Paper record
✓ Read
Randomized controlled trial · Zhonghua Wei Chang Wai Ke Za Zhi · 2005. Source record refreshed; an explanation has not been reviewed.
Randomized controlled trial2005
About this paper +
This page identifies the publication and its source. A checked explanation of its findings is not yet available.
Keep in mind: Checking bibliographic metadata does not verify a study’s conclusions or any advice previously linked to it.
Study details & source ↗
Paper record
✓ Read
Review · Arch Gen Psychiatry · 2005. Source record refreshed; an explanation has not been reviewed.
Review2005
About this paper +
This page identifies the publication and its source. A checked explanation of its findings is not yet available.
Keep in mind: Checking bibliographic metadata does not verify a study’s conclusions or any advice previously linked to it.
Study details & source ↗
Paper record
✓ Read