Meta-analysis · Am J Hypertens · 2002. Source record refreshed; an explanation has not been reviewed.
Meta-analysis2002
About this paper ＋
This page identifies the publication and its source. A checked explanation of its findings is not yet available.
Keep in mind: Checking bibliographic metadata does not verify a study’s conclusions or any advice previously linked to it.
Study details & source ↗Paper record
✓ Read
Randomized controlled trial · Eur J Endocrinol · 2002. Source record refreshed; an explanation has not been reviewed.
Randomized controlled trial2002
About this paper ＋
This page identifies the publication and its source. A checked explanation of its findings is not yet available.
Keep in mind: Checking bibliographic metadata does not verify a study’s conclusions or any advice previously linked to it.
Study details & source ↗Paper record
✓ Read
Randomized controlled trial · Lancet · 2002. Source record refreshed; an explanation has not been reviewed.
Randomized controlled trial2002
About this paper ＋
This page identifies the publication and its source. A checked explanation of its findings is not yet available.
Keep in mind: Checking bibliographic metadata does not verify a study’s conclusions or any advice previously linked to it.
Study details & source ↗Paper record
✓ Read
Systematic review · Cochrane Database Syst Rev · 2002. Source record refreshed; an explanation has not been reviewed.
Systematic review2002
About this paper ＋
This page identifies the publication and its source. A checked explanation of its findings is not yet available.
Keep in mind: Checking bibliographic metadata does not verify a study’s conclusions or any advice previously linked to it.
Study details & source ↗Paper record
✓ Read
Randomized controlled trial · Wien Klin Wochenschr · 2002. Source record refreshed; an explanation has not been reviewed.
Randomized controlled trial2002
About this paper ＋
This page identifies the publication and its source. A checked explanation of its findings is not yet available.
Keep in mind: Checking bibliographic metadata does not verify a study’s conclusions or any advice previously linked to it.
Study details & source ↗Paper record
✓ Read
Meta-analysis · Ann Pharmacother · 2002. Source record refreshed; an explanation has not been reviewed.
Meta-analysis2002
About this paper ＋
This page identifies the publication and its source. A checked explanation of its findings is not yet available.
Keep in mind: Checking bibliographic metadata does not verify a study’s conclusions or any advice previously linked to it.
Study details & source ↗Paper record
✓ Read
Meta-analysis · Br J Gen Pract · 2002. Source record refreshed; an explanation has not been reviewed.
Meta-analysis2002
About this paper ＋
This page identifies the publication and its source. A checked explanation of its findings is not yet available.
Keep in mind: Checking bibliographic metadata does not verify a study’s conclusions or any advice previously linked to it.
Study details & source ↗Paper record
✓ Read
Randomized controlled trial · Med Hypotheses · 2002. Source record refreshed; an explanation has not been reviewed.
Randomized controlled trial2002
About this paper ＋
This page identifies the publication and its source. A checked explanation of its findings is not yet available.
Keep in mind: Checking bibliographic metadata does not verify a study’s conclusions or any advice previously linked to it.
Study details & source ↗Paper record
✓ Read
Study design not specified in the source record · J Voice · 2002. Source record refreshed; an explanation has not been reviewed.
Study design not specified in the source record2002
About this paper ＋
This page identifies the publication and its source. A checked explanation of its findings is not yet available.
Keep in mind: Checking bibliographic metadata does not verify a study’s conclusions or any advice previously linked to it.
Study details & source ↗Paper record
✓ Read
Randomized controlled trial · Life Sci · 2002. Source record refreshed; an explanation has not been reviewed.
Randomized controlled trial2002
About this paper ＋
This page identifies the publication and its source. A checked explanation of its findings is not yet available.
Keep in mind: Checking bibliographic metadata does not verify a study’s conclusions or any advice previously linked to it.
Study details & source ↗Paper record
✓ Read
Study design not specified in the source record · Am J Respir Crit Care Med · 2002. Source record refreshed; an explanation has not been reviewed.
Study design not specified in the source record2002
About this paper ＋
This page identifies the publication and its source. A checked explanation of its findings is not yet available.
Keep in mind: Checking bibliographic metadata does not verify a study’s conclusions or any advice previously linked to it.
Study details & source ↗Paper record
✓ Read
Randomized controlled trial · Ter Arkh · 2002. Source record refreshed; an explanation has not been reviewed.
Randomized controlled trial2002
About this paper ＋
This page identifies the publication and its source. A checked explanation of its findings is not yet available.
Keep in mind: Checking bibliographic metadata does not verify a study’s conclusions or any advice previously linked to it.
Study details & source ↗Paper record
✓ Read
Randomized controlled trial · J Appl Physiol (1985) · 2002. Source record refreshed; an explanation has not been reviewed.
Randomized controlled trial2002
About this paper ＋
This page identifies the publication and its source. A checked explanation of its findings is not yet available.
Keep in mind: Checking bibliographic metadata does not verify a study’s conclusions or any advice previously linked to it.
Study details & source ↗Paper record
✓ Read
Randomized controlled trial · Br J Dermatol · 2002. Source record refreshed; an explanation has not been reviewed.
Randomized controlled trial2002
About this paper ＋
This page identifies the publication and its source. A checked explanation of its findings is not yet available.
Keep in mind: Checking bibliographic metadata does not verify a study’s conclusions or any advice previously linked to it.
Study details & source ↗Paper record
✓ Read
Randomized controlled trial · J Anim Sci · 2002. Source record refreshed; an explanation has not been reviewed.
Randomized controlled trial2002
About this paper ＋
This page identifies the publication and its source. A checked explanation of its findings is not yet available.
Keep in mind: Checking bibliographic metadata does not verify a study’s conclusions or any advice previously linked to it.
Study details & source ↗Paper record
✓ Read
Meta-analysis · Am J Epidemiol · 2002. Source record refreshed; an explanation has not been reviewed.
Meta-analysis2002
About this paper ＋
This page identifies the publication and its source. A checked explanation of its findings is not yet available.
Keep in mind: Checking bibliographic metadata does not verify a study’s conclusions or any advice previously linked to it.
Study details & source ↗Paper record
✓ Read
Randomized controlled trial · Med Sci Sports Exerc · 2002. Source record refreshed; an explanation has not been reviewed.
Randomized controlled trial2002
About this paper ＋
This page identifies the publication and its source. A checked explanation of its findings is not yet available.
Keep in mind: Checking bibliographic metadata does not verify a study’s conclusions or any advice previously linked to it.
Study details & source ↗Paper record
✓ Read
Systematic review · Cochrane Database Syst Rev · 2002. Source record refreshed; an explanation has not been reviewed.
Systematic review2002
About this paper ＋
This page identifies the publication and its source. A checked explanation of its findings is not yet available.
Keep in mind: Checking bibliographic metadata does not verify a study’s conclusions or any advice previously linked to it.
Study details & source ↗Paper record
✓ Read
Randomized controlled trial · Br J Surg · 2002. Source record refreshed; an explanation has not been reviewed.
Randomized controlled trial2002
About this paper ＋
This page identifies the publication and its source. A checked explanation of its findings is not yet available.
Keep in mind: Checking bibliographic metadata does not verify a study’s conclusions or any advice previously linked to it.
Study details & source ↗Paper record
✓ Read
Randomized controlled trial · J Strength Cond Res · 2002. Source record refreshed; an explanation has not been reviewed.
Randomized controlled trial2002
About this paper ＋
This page identifies the publication and its source. A checked explanation of its findings is not yet available.
Keep in mind: Checking bibliographic metadata does not verify a study’s conclusions or any advice previously linked to it.
Study details & source ↗Paper record
✓ Read
Randomized controlled trial · Ann Thorac Surg · 2002. Source record refreshed; an explanation has not been reviewed.
Randomized controlled trial2002
About this paper ＋
This page identifies the publication and its source. A checked explanation of its findings is not yet available.
Keep in mind: Checking bibliographic metadata does not verify a study’s conclusions or any advice previously linked to it.
Study details & source ↗Paper record
✓ Read
Randomized controlled trial · Med Sci Sports Exerc · 2002. Source record refreshed; an explanation has not been reviewed.
Randomized controlled trial2002
About this paper ＋
This page identifies the publication and its source. A checked explanation of its findings is not yet available.
Keep in mind: Checking bibliographic metadata does not verify a study’s conclusions or any advice previously linked to it.
Study details & source ↗Paper record
✓ Read
Meta-analysis · J Gerontol B Psychol Sci Soc Sci · 2002. Source record refreshed; an explanation has not been reviewed.
Meta-analysis2002
About this paper ＋
This page identifies the publication and its source. A checked explanation of its findings is not yet available.
Keep in mind: Checking bibliographic metadata does not verify a study’s conclusions or any advice previously linked to it.
Study details & source ↗Paper record
✓ Read
Study design not specified in the source record · J Vasc Access · 2001. Source record refreshed; an explanation has not been reviewed.
Study design not specified in the source record2001
About this paper ＋
This page identifies the publication and its source. A checked explanation of its findings is not yet available.
Keep in mind: Checking bibliographic metadata does not verify a study’s conclusions or any advice previously linked to it.
Study details & source ↗Paper record
✓ Read