Skip to content

Review leaves uncertainty about lying on the back after corneal surgery

Pooled studies found no statistically significant difference in graft detachment between postoperative positions, but substantial uncertainty remained.

By 100HP editorialAbstract-based explanation checked

Based on the published abstract. The full paper may contain additional methods, results and limitations.

The 30-second takeaway

The review did not detect a statistically significant difference in graft detachment between postoperative positioning groups. However, its uncertainty range allowed both lower and higher risk with positions other than lying on the back. These results do not establish that the positions are interchangeable or support changing an individual postoperative plan.

Keep in mind

This abstract-based explanation combines randomized and observational evidence. The abstract does not describe positioning schedules or follow-up lengths, limiting interpretation of the pooled result.

THE NUMBERS, WITH CONTEXT

What researchers found

Risk ratio 1.09; 95% confidence interval 0.52–2.26

Postoperative graft detachment

Other positions versus lying on the back: estimated detachment risk was 1.09 times as high, with confidence limits from 0.52 to 2.26 times as high. These are relative risks, not absolute probabilities. Follow-up was not reported.

Eur J Ophthalmol, 2026 · Original source ↓

Why uncertainty matters

The estimate sits close to equal risk, but its confidence interval spans lower and higher risk. A nonsignificant result therefore cannot establish equal outcomes or rule out an important difference.

Other outcomes

The review also detected no statistically significant differences in repeat graft surgery, rebubbling procedures, visual acuity, or eye pressure. Those comparisons do not resolve the uncertainty about graft attachment.

CHECK THE ORIGINAL

The original publication

Non-supine versus supine position after endothelial keratoplasty: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Ardiani LS, Dewi AS, Hutauruk JA et al.
Eur J Ophthalmol · 2026

PubMed ID
40888495
Record checked

AI-assisted research and writing. This explains one selected publication; it is not a complete review of everything known. Our approach.