Skip to content

Melatonin review found uncertain effects on intensive-care and hospital stays

After removing statistical outliers and adjusting for publication bias, pooled trials showed no statistically clear overall reduction in time spent in intensive care or hospital.

By 100HP editorialAbstract-based explanation checked

Based on the published abstract. The full paper may contain additional methods, results and limitations.

The 30-second takeaway

The adjusted analysis did not show a statistically clear overall shortening of intensive-care or hospital stays with melatonin or drugs acting on melatonin receptors. Some patient subgroups had more favorable results, but the review judged the overall evidence very uncertain. These findings do not establish a routine benefit for adults admitted to intensive care.

Keep in mind

Results varied substantially between studies, and the review rated the evidence as very low certainty. The subgroup findings do not establish that all intensive-care patients benefit, while nonsignificant overall results do not prove no effect.

THE RESULT, WITH CONTEXT

What researchers found

No statistically clear difference

Mean ICU length of stay

Melatonin or receptor agonists versus placebo during ICU admission, after outlier removal and adjustment for publication bias.

PLoS One, 2025 · Original source ↓

What the abstract analyzed

The review focused on how long patients stayed in intensive care or hospital. Researchers reanalyzed the evidence after removing statistical outliers and adjusting for publication bias, making those checks central to interpreting the overall findings.

Subgroups need separate interpretation

Shorter stays were reported in subgroup analyses for coronary bypass patients in intensive care and patients with COVID-19 in hospital. These narrower findings need confirmation and cannot be generalized across admissions.

CHECK THE ORIGINAL

The original publication

The effect of exogenous melatonin and melatonin receptor agonists on intensive care unit and hospital length of stay: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Kelleher AB, O'Donovan M, O'Doherty D et al.
PLoS One · 2025

PubMed ID
40920753
Record checked

AI-assisted research and writing. This explains one selected publication; it is not a complete review of everything known. Our approach.