Skip to content

Fixed and personalized sit-stand schedules tested for lower back pain

Workers with existing back pain reported improvements with both approaches, but the abstract leaves uncertainty about the size of any advantage between schedules.

By 100HP editorialAbstract-based explanation checked

Based on the published abstract. The full paper may contain additional methods, results and limitations.

The 30-second takeaway

Both sitting-and-standing schedules were followed by less severe worst back pain among workers who already had pain. The fixed schedule also had a reported reduction in average pain and better adherence. However, the abstract reports changes within each group without a numerical between-group comparison, limiting how confidently readers can judge relative effectiveness.

Keep in mind

The abstract supplies within-group changes without confidence intervals or a numerical between-group effect estimate. This limits assessment of whether pain changes differed reliably between schedules.

THE NUMBERS, WITH CONTEXT

What researchers found

-1.33 points/10 (fixed); -0.69 points/10 (personalized)

Change in worst lower back pain

Pain was scored out of 10; negative changes mean less pain. These are changes within each group over 3 months, not a direct comparison between schedules.

Appl Ergon, 2026 · Original source ↓

How the schedules differed

The fixed group followed prescribed sitting and standing intervals. The personalized group could choose its own timing or change posture before discomfort. Both groups already had back pain when they entered the study.

Acceptability and other outcomes

Both schedules were acceptable, with higher adherence to fixed timing. Stress, concentration and presenteeism (functioning at work while unwell) improved within the fixed group. Sitting time fell within the personalized group. These changes do not establish superiority on those secondary outcomes.

CHECK THE ORIGINAL

The original publication

Do fixed or personalised sit-stand desk ratios improve lower back pain? A randomised trial.

Brakenridge CL, Johnston V, Andrews NE et al.
Appl Ergon · 2026

PubMed ID
41124790
Record checked

AI-assisted research and writing. This explains one selected publication; it is not a complete review of everything known. Our approach.