Testosterone findings differ for kidney disease presence and prognosis
A retrospective study found no significant hormone difference by kidney-disease status, yet reported an association with prognosis among affected men. Key details of that association remain unclear.
Based on the published abstract. The full paper may contain additional methods, results and limitations.
The 30-second takeaway
Testosterone levels did not differ significantly between men with and without diabetic kidney disease. Within the kidney-disease group, levels varied by disease stage, and an adjusted analysis linked testosterone to poor prognosis. These findings describe different comparisons; they do not show that testosterone causes kidney damage or that changing it improves outcomes.
The abstract does not define the poor-prognosis outcome, the testosterone contrast behind the association, or the follow-up period. The prediction model also requires validation.
What researchers found
Plasma testosterone concentration
Men with versus without diabetic kidney disease in the retrospective cohort; measurement timing was not reported.
Several questions were examined
Researchers used existing clinical and laboratory records to examine disease presence, stage and prognosis. A prediction model combined testosterone with other patient measures, so its reported performance cannot be attributed to testosterone alone.
Interpreting the apparently different results
The absence of a significant difference between diagnostic groups does not rule out a relationship within people who already have kidney disease. However, a prognosis association still needs a clearly defined outcome and independent validation.
The original publication
The association of plasma testosterone level and progression of diabetic nephropathy in male.
Tang K, Du C, Zhou W et al.
BMC Endocr Disord · 2025
- PubMed ID
- 41168769
- Record checked
AI-assisted research and writing. This explains one selected publication; it is not a complete review of everything known. Our approach.
One more question, understood.
Keep track of the research you’ve explored.