Skip to content

Follow-up contacts may help physical activity gains last

Booster support collectively showed a signal for maintaining activity, but the best format and schedule remain uncertain.

By 100HP editorialAbstract-based explanation checked

Based on the published abstract. The full paper may contain additional methods, results and limitations.

The 30-second takeaway

Programs with follow-up contacts showed better activity maintenance than programs alone. Analyses linked more contacts with greater activity, and remote or mixed delivery with greater activity than in-person contacts. These patterns do not establish an optimal schedule or format. Results using self-reported activity were favourable, but other measurement methods were not clarified in the abstract.

Keep in mind

The abstract does not explain the scale or give uncertainty bounds for the added-effect estimate. It also omits participant details and risk-of-bias results, limiting interpretation of this abstract-based summary.

THE RESULT, WITH CONTEXT

What researchers found

Favoured booster support

Physical activity maintenance

Programs with boosters versus programs alone; the meta-analysis assessed moderate-to-vigorous activity change from baseline to the latest follow-up. Follow-up lengths were not reported.

Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act, 2025 · Original source ↓

What the review examined

Researchers grouped follow-up contacts by type and number, then assessed activity maintenance. Calls and text messages were common formats. The pooled analysis tracked moderate-to-vigorous activity from baseline to the latest follow-up.

Interpreting the formats

The overall finding applies to booster support collectively. The abstract does not establish separate effects for calls or messages. Its authors call for more research on the best number and format of follow-up contacts.

CHECK THE ORIGINAL

The original publication

Effectiveness of booster strategies to promote physical activity maintenance: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Tarantino G, Ntoumanis N, Neville R et al.
Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act · 2025

PubMed ID
41194192
Record checked

AI-assisted research and writing. This explains one selected publication; it is not a complete review of everything known. Our approach.