Creatine review reports strength gains, with gaps around dose and training
The abstract describes stronger muscles after supplementation, but gives too little detail to judge effect size or identify a preferred dose and training combination.
Based on the published abstract. The full paper may contain additional methods, results and limitations.
The 30-second takeaway
The review reports significant strength gains after creatine supplementation. It also describes differences across training experience, dose categories and training intensity, while age comparisons remained inconclusive. However, the abstract gives no effect estimates or details of control conditions, so it cannot show how large the gains were or establish a preferred dosing or training strategy.
The abstract omits the number and design of included studies, participant totals, effect estimates and dose definitions. Its broad conclusion cannot establish the size of the strength gain or a reliable dose ranking.
What the review assessed
The review assessed strength responses across training experience, dose and training intensity. Groups did not differ statistically in strength before supplementation, but the abstract does not specify the strength tests, intervention lengths or control conditions.
Subgroup patterns need detail
The authors describe larger gains in untrained groups, more favorable results in lower dose categories and stronger effects alongside higher intensity training. Without estimates or subgroup comparison methods, those descriptions do not establish an optimal regimen.
The original publication
Effects of creatine supplementation on muscle strength gains-a meta-analysis and systematic review.
Zhang H, Lan T, Yan X et al.
PeerJ · 2025
- PubMed ID
- 41328071
- Record checked
AI-assisted research and writing. This explains one selected publication; it is not a complete review of everything known. Our approach.
One more question, understood.
Keep track of the research you’ve explored.