Skip to content

Exercise studies suggest improved internet-addiction outcomes, with important uncertainty

A meta-analysis favored exercise interventions, but unclear participant descriptions and uneven study quality limit how confidently the results can be applied.

By 100HP editorialAbstract-based explanation checked

Based on the published abstract. The full paper may contain additional methods, results and limitations.

The 30-second takeaway

Exercise interventions were associated with better internet-addiction outcomes than control conditions in the pooled analysis. A category called combined movement ranked highest in the network analysis. However, small samples and uneven study quality make the findings preliminary, and the abstract does not clearly explain who participated or what the combined program involved.

Keep in mind

The abstract shifts between university students and adolescents and omits assessment scales, follow-up times and intervention details. The authors also identify small samples and varying study quality as limitations.

THE NUMBERS, WITH CONTEXT

What researchers found

SMD -2.33 (95% CI -3.00 to -1.66)

Internet-addiction outcomes

Exercise versus control groups; assessment timing and named scales were not reported. The standardized mean difference favored exercise.

Front Psychiatry, 2025 · Original source ↓

How to read the pooled result

The result describes a standardized difference in internet-addiction outcomes between groups. It does not show a percentage reduction in internet use, an amount of time saved online, or how many participants recovered.

Why the ranking needs caution

Combined movement received the highest ranking probability, but rankings alone do not establish dependable superiority over every alternative. The abstract does not describe this intervention well enough to turn the result into a practical exercise program.

CHECK THE ORIGINAL

The original publication

The effects of different exercise interventions on reducing internet addiction in adolescents or young adults: a systematic review and network meta-analysis.

Li Y, Zhong S, Lian L
Front Psychiatry · 2025

PubMed ID
41383987
Record checked

AI-assisted research and writing. This explains one selected publication; it is not a complete review of everything known. Our approach.