Skip to content

Resisted sprint training outperformed unresisted training overall, with results varying by experience

A research synthesis favored resisted sprints, but the findings do not identify a single best load for every training level.

By 100HP editorialAbstract-based explanation checked

Based on the published abstract. The full paper may contain additional methods, results and limitations.

The 30-second takeaway

Resisted sprint training improved sprint performance more than unresisted training in the pooled comparison. Comparisons between loads also favored very heavy over light resistance. However, the advantage of heavier loads was clearer in trained groups, with no clear benefit for recreational groups. These results do not justify a universal loading prescription.

Keep in mind

The abstract gives no confidence interval for the overall standardized effect or a common assessment timeframe. Results also varied with participants’ training experience and program characteristics.

THE NUMBERS, WITH CONTEXT

What researchers found

Hedges’ g = -0.30

Sprint performance

Resisted versus unresisted training across the included interventions; assessment timing was not reported. This standardized effect favored resisted training and had moderate evidence certainty.

Scand J Med Sci Sports, 2025 · Original source ↓

Reading the pooled effect

The reported effect is a standardized difference between training groups, not a percentage improvement or a number of seconds saved. It summarizes sprint performance across studies, while the abstract leaves its overall precision unclear.

What load comparisons establish

Models comparing resistance loads favored very heavy over light resistance. This supports that specific contrast; separate findings that some loads were statistically significant against unresisted training cannot establish a complete ranking of every load.

CHECK THE ORIGINAL

The original publication

Effects of Resisted-Sprint Training on Sprint Performance and Mechanics: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis Focusing on Load Magnitude.

Xu K, Jukic I, Cross MR et al.
Scand J Med Sci Sports · 2025

PubMed ID
41384676
Record checked

AI-assisted research and writing. This explains one selected publication; it is not a complete review of everything known. Our approach.