Burnout estimates among paediatric surgeons vary widely across studies
The pooled estimate describes a workforce concern, but differences in questionnaires and study results limit its relevance to any particular workplace.
Based on the published abstract. The full paper may contain additional methods, results and limitations.
The 30-second takeaway
Burnout affected a substantial share of paediatric surgeons in the reviewed studies, but the pooled estimate masks wide variation. Studies using different questionnaires produced different prevalence estimates. The review describes the size of a workforce problem; it does not establish which workplace changes or personal characteristics would prevent it.
Results differed substantially between studies, and measurement tools influenced estimates. The abstract omits assessment periods and detailed settings, limiting judgments about how well the pooled figure applies locally.
What researchers found
Pooled burnout prevalence among paediatric surgeons
The estimated proportion meeting study burnout criteria across the included samples; no treatment comparator. Assessment periods: Not reported in the abstract.
What was counted
The review required primary studies using validated burnout measures. It combined their prevalence estimates, while also examining how study quality and measurement choices contributed to differences in the reported results.
Why measurement matters
Studies using the Maslach Burnout Inventory reported lower prevalence than studies using other tools. Because these were comparisons across studies, the result does not establish which questionnaire provides the most accurate estimate.
The original publication
Burnout among paediatric surgeons: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Kirdar-Smith S, Twumasi R, Capon C et al.
BMJ Paediatr Open · 2025
- PubMed ID
- 41423255
- Record checked
AI-assisted research and writing. This explains one selected publication; it is not a complete review of everything known. Our approach.
One more question, understood.
Keep track of the research you’ve explored.