Skip to content

Similar cardiac rehabilitation gains accompanied different gaps in target attainment

After acute coronary syndrome, women and men showed broadly similar changes during cardiac rehabilitation, while later activity, anxiety, and aerobic-capacity targets differed in how often they were met.

By 100HP editorialAbstract-based explanation checked

Based on the published abstract. The full paper may contain additional methods, results and limitations.

The 30-second takeaway

Women and men generally showed similar improvements during cardiac rehabilitation. Women improved more on depressive symptoms, yet were less likely to meet later physical-activity and anxiety targets. Men were less likely to meet aerobic-capacity targets. Similar changes during rehabilitation therefore did not mean equal proportions reached those targets afterward.

Keep in mind

This abstract-based analysis does not report the numerical thresholds for its targets or establish why gaps persisted. It also cannot show whether a tailored rehabilitation program would close them.

THE NUMBERS, WITH CONTEXT

What researchers found

76.5% versus 93.1%

Meeting physical-activity targets

Women versus men at 18 months' follow-up; p < 0.001.

J Rehabil Med, 2026 · Original source ↓

What researchers compared

Researchers assessed walking performance, movement, cardiovascular risk factors, and psychological well-being. They compared women with men within an existing trial and accounted for age and differences present at the start.

Later gaps in reaching targets

At later follow-up, fewer women met the activity and anxiety targets, while fewer men met the aerobic-capacity target. These differences remained despite the broadly similar improvements reported during rehabilitation.

CHECK THE ORIGINAL

The original publication

Women and men profit equally from cardiac rehabilitation: a secondary analysis of the OPTICARE RCT.

Ter Hoeve N, De Bakker M, Sunamura M et al.
J Rehabil Med · 2026

PubMed ID
41498600
Record checked

AI-assisted research and writing. This explains one selected publication; it is not a complete review of everything known. Our approach.