Skip to content

Overtraining in elite athletes is linked to mood changes; cognitive evidence is limited

A systematic review found psychological changes with both non-functional overreaching and overtraining syndrome, but evidence about thinking skills was sparse and did not show the same pattern.

By 100HP editorialAbstract-based explanation checked

Based on the published abstract. The full paper may contain additional methods, results and limitations.

The 30-second takeaway

Elite athletes experiencing non-functional overreaching or overtraining syndrome showed changes in mood, stress, burnout, and fatigue. Evidence on cognition was much thinner: difficulties with inhibitory control were suggested for overtraining syndrome, while no clear deficits emerged for non-functional overreaching. That difference is tentative and does not establish that either condition has a uniform effect on thinking.

Keep in mind

The abstract describes limited, highly varied evidence on psychological well-being and little research on cognition. It does not provide effect sizes, study durations, or enough study-level detail to judge causality.

Who the review concerned

The review specifically concerned elite adults, whose training and competition demands were the focus. It separated non-functional overreaching from overtraining syndrome instead of treating all athletes or all training-related difficulties as interchangeable.

A narrow cognitive picture

Most cognitive evidence addressed inhibition, a narrow part of cognitive functioning. A lack of clear deficits in non-functional overreaching therefore leaves uncertainty about other thinking skills and should not be read as proof of no cognitive effect.

CHECK THE ORIGINAL

The original publication

Effects of non-functional overreaching and overtraining syndrome on psychological and cognitive functioning in elite athletes: A systematic review.

Valdesalici A, Sella E, Domenicucci R et al.
Psychol Sport Exerc · 2026

PubMed ID
41580212
Record checked

AI-assisted research and writing. This explains one selected publication; it is not a complete review of everything known. Our approach.