Skip to content

Training visiting nurses increased hearing screening in a short follow-up trial

An education program improved nurses' screening practice, knowledge and confidence; the abstract does not report changes in older adults' hearing or wellbeing.

By 100HP editorialAbstract-based explanation checked

Based on the published abstract. The full paper may contain additional methods, results and limitations.

The 30-second takeaway

Visiting nurses offered hearing-care lectures and technical exercises were more likely to implement hearing screening than controls during follow-up. Knowledge and confidence also improved. The measured benefits concerned nursing practice and skills; the abstract does not show that older adults heard better, experienced better quality of life or avoided other health problems.

Keep in mind

This abstract-based summary lacks absolute screening rates, details of the control condition and patient hearing outcomes. The odds ratio describes relative odds of screening implementation and cannot show how many additional patients were screened.

THE NUMBERS, WITH CONTEXT

What researchers found

Odds ratio 8.35 (95% CI 3.60–19.34)

Nurses' implementation of hearing screening

Education versus control over 3 months; the estimate concerns screening practice, not patients' hearing.

PLoS One, 2026 · Original source ↓

How the program was tested

Nursing stations were assigned to education or control groups. The program combined on-demand lectures with practical exercises, and researchers assessed hearing-care implementation alongside nurses' knowledge and confidence during follow-up.

What the estimate means

The reported odds ratio favored education, but the abstract does not give screening rates in either group. It therefore cannot tell readers the absolute change in screening or whether newly screened patients benefited.

CHECK THE ORIGINAL

The original publication

Effect of a hearing loss care education program for older adults targeted at visiting nurses: A cluster randomized controlled trial.

Nabeshima S, Sugiura S, Yamada K et al.
PLoS One · 2026

PubMed ID
41592081
Record checked

AI-assisted research and writing. This explains one selected publication; it is not a complete review of everything known. Our approach.