Skip to content

Mindfulness did not clearly outperform social contact for loneliness

In older adults experiencing loneliness in Hong Kong, a randomized trial found no statistically clear difference between mindfulness groups and social contact groups on the main outcome.

By 100HP editorialAbstract-based explanation checked

Based on the published abstract. The full paper may contain additional methods, results and limitations.

The 30-second takeaway

The mindfulness program did not show a statistically clear advantage over social contact for loneliness at the primary follow-up. Loneliness improved within both groups, but those changes alone cannot establish which program caused improvement. The result leaves uncertainty about any difference between the programs and should not be read as proof of equivalence.

Keep in mind

The abstract gives no confidence interval for the main difference and does not name the loneliness scale. The reported nonsignificant result cannot rule out a meaningful difference between programs.

THE NUMBERS, WITH CONTEXT

What researchers found

Mean difference -0.14; p=0.52

Loneliness score at 12 months

Mindfulness versus social contact; between-group score difference. The questionnaire scale is not named in the abstract.

BMJ Ment Health, 2026 · Original source ↓

What was compared

Both programs involved face-to-face group sessions with the same schedule and session length. This active comparison tested whether mindfulness offered an advantage over another group experience, with social contact included in the control condition.

Secondary outcomes differed

Participants assigned to mindfulness reported fewer depressive symptoms than the social contact group at 6 months, alongside a decreasing trend in anxiety. These secondary findings address different outcomes from the trial’s main loneliness question.

CHECK THE ORIGINAL

The original publication

Effects of a mindfulness-based intervention versus a social contact control in alleviating loneliness among older adults: a randomised controlled trial.

Wong ET, Lee EK, Mo PK et al.
BMJ Ment Health · 2026

PubMed ID
41628950
Record checked

AI-assisted research and writing. This explains one selected publication; it is not a complete review of everything known. Our approach.