Skip to content

Brahmi memory findings come with uncertainty about indirect comparisons

A network review reported working-memory gains with Brahmi, but attention and processing-speed results were not significant, and direct comparisons were lacking.

By 100HP editorialAbstract-based explanation checked

Based on the published abstract. The full paper may contain additional methods, results and limitations.

The 30-second takeaway

The review reported better working memory with the higher Brahmi dose category than with placebo and other extract groups. These were network estimates, with no direct Brahmi-versus-Ginkgo trials reported. Attention and processing speed did not show significant differences. These cognitive test results do not establish benefits for daily functioning.

Keep in mind

The lack of direct Brahmi–Ginkgo comparisons limits confidence in their relative effects. The abstract does not report trial durations or adverse-event results.

THE NUMBERS, WITH CONTEXT

What researchers found

2.03 standard deviations higher

Working memory (standardized mean difference)

Brahmi ≥600 mg/day versus placebo; 95% confidence interval: 1.28–2.78 standard deviations higher. Assessment timeframe not reported in the abstract.

Phytomedicine, 2026 · Original source ↓

What the estimate measures

The estimate expresses differences in memory test performance in standard deviations, a measure of variation in test scores. Its positive sign favors Brahmi; it does not measure a percentage improvement or benefits in daily life.

Different cognitive outcomes

Higher-dose Brahmi also showed short-term memory benefits, while lower-dose Brahmi outperformed lower-dose Ginkgo and placebo for delayed memory. Sustained attention, selective attention, and processing speed showed no statistically significant differences.

CHECK THE ORIGINAL

The original publication

Comparative effects of Bacopa monnieri and Ginkgo biloba on cognitive functions: A systematic review and network meta-analysis.

Tiemtad P, Ingkaninan K, Temkitthawon P et al.
Phytomedicine · 2026

PubMed ID
41678913
Record checked

AI-assisted research and writing. This explains one selected publication; it is not a complete review of everything known. Our approach.