Skip to content

Sexual function after prostate biopsy: overall results and findings within the cancer subgroup

Overall sexual function scores showed no significant change. Men diagnosed with prostate cancer had score declines relative to their own starting scores.

By 100HP editorialAbstract-based explanation checked

Based on the published abstract. The full paper may contain additional methods, results and limitations.

The 30-second takeaway

The abstract reports no statistically significant overall change in erectile or ejaculatory function after transperineal biopsy. Men diagnosed with prostate cancer had lower questionnaire scores than at their own baseline. These observations do not establish that biopsy caused the changes or that sexual function was unaffected in every patient.

Keep in mind

The abstract reports follow-up only through 3 months and gives no results from an unbiopsied comparison group. It cannot establish whether the subgroup's score changes persisted.

THE RESULT, WITH CONTEXT

What researchers found

No statistically significant change

Erectile and ejaculatory function

Overall cohort at 1 and 3 months after biopsy versus its own baseline; questionnaire assessments.

J Clin Med, 2026 · Original source ↓

What was measured

Researchers used questionnaires to assess erection and ejaculation before biopsy and during follow-up. The abstract does not quantify score changes or explain how to interpret the direction of each scale.

Understanding the subgroup

Among 132 men diagnosed with prostate cancer, scores declined significantly from their own baseline at both follow-up assessments. This finding within the subgroup does not establish a difference between men with and without cancer.

CHECK THE ORIGINAL

The original publication

Does Transperineal Prostate Biopsy Affect Sexual Function? Results from a Prospective Cohort Study.

Kucuker K, Simsek A, Kirdar M et al.
J Clin Med · 2026

PubMed ID
41682945
Record checked

AI-assisted research and writing. This explains one selected publication; it is not a complete review of everything known. Our approach.