Skip to content

Stabilization exercises showed a balance benefit in people with chronic lumbopelvic pain

The clearest pooled result favored stabilization exercises on the Y balance test, but the authors rated the evidence as low certainty.

By 100HP editorialAbstract-based explanation checked

Based on the published abstract. The full paper may contain additional methods, results and limitations.

The 30-second takeaway

Stabilization exercises may improve dynamic balance in people with longstanding pain around the lower back and pelvis. However, the pooled advantage was specific to studies using the Y balance test. The evidence was low certainty, so the result should not be treated as a dependable benefit across all balance measures or patients.

Keep in mind

The authors downgraded certainty because of trial bias and imprecision linked to small samples. Static-balance studies used inconsistent measurement tools, and the abstract does not report intervention durations or longer-term outcomes.

THE NUMBERS, WITH CONTEXT

What researchers found

SMD 0.71 (confidence interval 0.22 to 1.19)

Dynamic balance on the Y balance test

Stabilization exercise versus conventional physical therapy; timeframe unreported. The difference is measured in standard deviations, using the spread of scores as the unit. The authors describe a moderate advantage for stabilization; the confidence level is unspecified.

Physiother Res Int, 2026 · Original source ↓

The test mattered

Balance during movement was assessed separately from balance while still. The review found that measurement choice mattered: the favorable pooled result was confined to studies using a particular dynamic-balance test.

Static balance was harder to combine

Most studies reported better static balance, but they measured it in different ways. That limits how directly those results can be compared and how confidently a single overall conclusion can be drawn.

CHECK THE ORIGINAL

The original publication

Stabilization Exercises for Enhancing Balance in Adults With Non-Specific Chronic Lumbopelvic Pain: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Alkhameys FA, Cheng K, Huang CK et al.
Physiother Res Int · 2026

PubMed ID
41880554
Record checked

AI-assisted research and writing. This explains one selected publication; it is not a complete review of everything known. Our approach.