Year, sort & publication alerts +
658 results to explore
Clinical trial · J Appl Physiol (1985) · 1998. Source record refreshed; an explanation has not been reviewed.
Clinical trial1998
About this paper +
This page identifies the publication and its source. A checked explanation of its findings is not yet available.
Keep in mind: Checking bibliographic metadata does not verify a study’s conclusions or any advice previously linked to it.
Study details & source ↗
Paper record
✓ Read
Clinical trial · Clin Physiol · 1998. Source record refreshed; an explanation has not been reviewed.
Clinical trial1998
About this paper +
This page identifies the publication and its source. A checked explanation of its findings is not yet available.
Keep in mind: Checking bibliographic metadata does not verify a study’s conclusions or any advice previously linked to it.
Study details & source ↗
Paper record
✓ Read
Randomized controlled trial · Eur J Appl Physiol Occup Physiol · 1998. Source record refreshed; an explanation has not been reviewed.
Randomized controlled trial1998
About this paper +
This page identifies the publication and its source. A checked explanation of its findings is not yet available.
Keep in mind: Checking bibliographic metadata does not verify a study’s conclusions or any advice previously linked to it.
Study details & source ↗
Paper record
✓ Read
Clinical trial · Eur J Appl Physiol Occup Physiol · 1996. Source record refreshed; an explanation has not been reviewed.
Clinical trial1996
About this paper +
This page identifies the publication and its source. A checked explanation of its findings is not yet available.
Keep in mind: Checking bibliographic metadata does not verify a study’s conclusions or any advice previously linked to it.
Study details & source ↗
Paper record
✓ Read
Clinical trial · Pflugers Arch · 1996. Source record refreshed; an explanation has not been reviewed.
Clinical trial1996
About this paper +
This page identifies the publication and its source. A checked explanation of its findings is not yet available.
Keep in mind: Checking bibliographic metadata does not verify a study’s conclusions or any advice previously linked to it.
Study details & source ↗
Paper record
✓ Read
Randomized controlled trial · Obes Res · 1995. Source record refreshed; an explanation has not been reviewed.
Randomized controlled trial1995
About this paper +
This page identifies the publication and its source. A checked explanation of its findings is not yet available.
Keep in mind: Checking bibliographic metadata does not verify a study’s conclusions or any advice previously linked to it.
Study details & source ↗
Paper record
✓ Read
Clinical trial · Mol Chem Neuropathol · 1995. Source record refreshed; an explanation has not been reviewed.
Clinical trial1995
About this paper +
This page identifies the publication and its source. A checked explanation of its findings is not yet available.
Keep in mind: Checking bibliographic metadata does not verify a study’s conclusions or any advice previously linked to it.
Study details & source ↗
Paper record
✓ Read
Randomized controlled trial · Pharmacol Biochem Behav · 1995. Source record refreshed; an explanation has not been reviewed.
Randomized controlled trial1995
About this paper +
This page identifies the publication and its source. A checked explanation of its findings is not yet available.
Keep in mind: Checking bibliographic metadata does not verify a study’s conclusions or any advice previously linked to it.
Study details & source ↗
Paper record
✓ Read
Clinical trial · Neurogastroenterol Motil · 1995. Source record refreshed; an explanation has not been reviewed.
Clinical trial1995
About this paper +
This page identifies the publication and its source. A checked explanation of its findings is not yet available.
Keep in mind: Checking bibliographic metadata does not verify a study’s conclusions or any advice previously linked to it.
Study details & source ↗
Paper record
✓ Read
Randomized controlled trial · Asian Pac J Allergy Immunol · 1995. Source record refreshed; an explanation has not been reviewed.
Randomized controlled trial1995
About this paper +
This page identifies the publication and its source. A checked explanation of its findings is not yet available.
Keep in mind: Checking bibliographic metadata does not verify a study’s conclusions or any advice previously linked to it.
Study details & source ↗
Paper record
✓ Read
⌕No research matches that yet.
Try a broader word, or explore another topic.
Topics help you browse; they are not clinical recommendations. What our review labels mean ↗