Systematic review · Res Dev Disabil · 2016. Source record refreshed; an explanation has not been reviewed.
Systematic review2016
About this paper ＋
This page identifies the publication and its source. A checked explanation of its findings is not yet available.
Keep in mind: Checking bibliographic metadata does not verify a study’s conclusions or any advice previously linked to it.
Study details & source ↗Paper record
✓ Read
Randomized controlled trial · Eur J Pediatr · 2016. Source record refreshed; an explanation has not been reviewed.
Randomized controlled trial2016
About this paper ＋
This page identifies the publication and its source. A checked explanation of its findings is not yet available.
Keep in mind: Checking bibliographic metadata does not verify a study’s conclusions or any advice previously linked to it.
Study details & source ↗Paper record
✓ Read
Randomized controlled trial · Neuroimage · 2016. Source record refreshed; an explanation has not been reviewed.
Randomized controlled trial2016
About this paper ＋
This page identifies the publication and its source. A checked explanation of its findings is not yet available.
Keep in mind: Checking bibliographic metadata does not verify a study’s conclusions or any advice previously linked to it.
Study details & source ↗Paper record
✓ Read
Systematic review · Ageing Res Rev · 2016. Source record refreshed; an explanation has not been reviewed.
Systematic review2016
About this paper ＋
This page identifies the publication and its source. A checked explanation of its findings is not yet available.
Keep in mind: Checking bibliographic metadata does not verify a study’s conclusions or any advice previously linked to it.
Study details & source ↗Paper record
✓ Read
Randomized controlled trial · Epilepsia · 2016. Source record refreshed; an explanation has not been reviewed.
Randomized controlled trial2016
About this paper ＋
This page identifies the publication and its source. A checked explanation of its findings is not yet available.
Keep in mind: Checking bibliographic metadata does not verify a study’s conclusions or any advice previously linked to it.
Study details & source ↗Paper record
✓ Read
Study design not specified in the source record · J Affect Disord · 2016. Source record refreshed; an explanation has not been reviewed.
Study design not specified in the source record2016
About this paper ＋
This page identifies the publication and its source. A checked explanation of its findings is not yet available.
Keep in mind: Checking bibliographic metadata does not verify a study’s conclusions or any advice previously linked to it.
Study details & source ↗Paper record
✓ Read
Meta-analysis · J Affect Disord · 2016. Source record refreshed; an explanation has not been reviewed.
Meta-analysis2016
About this paper ＋
This page identifies the publication and its source. A checked explanation of its findings is not yet available.
Keep in mind: Checking bibliographic metadata does not verify a study’s conclusions or any advice previously linked to it.
Study details & source ↗Paper record
✓ Read
Meta-analysis · Int J Geriatr Psychiatry · 2016. Source record refreshed; an explanation has not been reviewed.
Meta-analysis2016
About this paper ＋
This page identifies the publication and its source. A checked explanation of its findings is not yet available.
Keep in mind: Checking bibliographic metadata does not verify a study’s conclusions or any advice previously linked to it.
Study details & source ↗Paper record
✓ Read
Randomized controlled trial · Int J Geriatr Psychiatry · 2016. Source record refreshed; an explanation has not been reviewed.
Randomized controlled trial2016
About this paper ＋
This page identifies the publication and its source. A checked explanation of its findings is not yet available.
Keep in mind: Checking bibliographic metadata does not verify a study’s conclusions or any advice previously linked to it.
Study details & source ↗Paper record
✓ Read
Randomized controlled trial · Asian J Psychiatr · 2016. Source record refreshed; an explanation has not been reviewed.
Randomized controlled trial2016
About this paper ＋
This page identifies the publication and its source. A checked explanation of its findings is not yet available.
Keep in mind: Checking bibliographic metadata does not verify a study’s conclusions or any advice previously linked to it.
Study details & source ↗Paper record
✓ Read
Randomized controlled trial · Gac Sanit · 2016. Source record refreshed; an explanation has not been reviewed.
Randomized controlled trial2016
About this paper ＋
This page identifies the publication and its source. A checked explanation of its findings is not yet available.
Keep in mind: Checking bibliographic metadata does not verify a study’s conclusions or any advice previously linked to it.
Study details & source ↗Paper record
✓ Read
Meta-analysis · J Couns Psychol · 2016. Source record refreshed; an explanation has not been reviewed.
Meta-analysis2016
About this paper ＋
This page identifies the publication and its source. A checked explanation of its findings is not yet available.
Keep in mind: Checking bibliographic metadata does not verify a study’s conclusions or any advice previously linked to it.
Study details & source ↗Paper record
✓ Read
Randomized controlled trial · J Alzheimers Dis · 2016. Source record refreshed; an explanation has not been reviewed.
Randomized controlled trial2016
About this paper ＋
This page identifies the publication and its source. A checked explanation of its findings is not yet available.
Keep in mind: Checking bibliographic metadata does not verify a study’s conclusions or any advice previously linked to it.
Study details & source ↗Paper record
✓ Read
Randomized controlled trial · Eur J Pediatr · 2016. Source record refreshed; an explanation has not been reviewed.
Randomized controlled trial2016
About this paper ＋
This page identifies the publication and its source. A checked explanation of its findings is not yet available.
Keep in mind: Checking bibliographic metadata does not verify a study’s conclusions or any advice previously linked to it.
Study details & source ↗Paper record
✓ Read
Meta-analysis · Psychotherapy (Chic) · 2016. Source record refreshed; an explanation has not been reviewed.
Meta-analysis2016
About this paper ＋
This page identifies the publication and its source. A checked explanation of its findings is not yet available.
Keep in mind: Checking bibliographic metadata does not verify a study’s conclusions or any advice previously linked to it.
Study details & source ↗Paper record
✓ Read
Study design not specified in the source record · Geriatr Gerontol Int · 2016. Source record refreshed; an explanation has not been reviewed.
Study design not specified in the source record2016
About this paper ＋
This page identifies the publication and its source. A checked explanation of its findings is not yet available.
Keep in mind: Checking bibliographic metadata does not verify a study’s conclusions or any advice previously linked to it.
Study details & source ↗Paper record
✓ Read
Systematic review · J Ment Health · 2016. Source record refreshed; an explanation has not been reviewed.
Systematic review2016
About this paper ＋
This page identifies the publication and its source. A checked explanation of its findings is not yet available.
Keep in mind: Checking bibliographic metadata does not verify a study’s conclusions or any advice previously linked to it.
Study details & source ↗Paper record
✓ Read
Randomized controlled trial · Clin Rheumatol · 2016. Source record refreshed; an explanation has not been reviewed.
Randomized controlled trial2016
About this paper ＋
This page identifies the publication and its source. A checked explanation of its findings is not yet available.
Keep in mind: Checking bibliographic metadata does not verify a study’s conclusions or any advice previously linked to it.
Study details & source ↗Paper record
✓ Read
Randomized controlled trial · Psychol Psychother · 2016. Source record refreshed; an explanation has not been reviewed.
Randomized controlled trial2016
About this paper ＋
This page identifies the publication and its source. A checked explanation of its findings is not yet available.
Keep in mind: Checking bibliographic metadata does not verify a study’s conclusions or any advice previously linked to it.
Study details & source ↗Paper record
✓ Read
Randomized controlled trial · Support Care Cancer · 2016. Source record refreshed; an explanation has not been reviewed.
Randomized controlled trial2016
About this paper ＋
This page identifies the publication and its source. A checked explanation of its findings is not yet available.
Keep in mind: Checking bibliographic metadata does not verify a study’s conclusions or any advice previously linked to it.
Study details & source ↗Paper record
✓ Read
This publication is retracted. Read the source notice before using its findings.
Randomized controlled trial2016
About this paper ＋
The current PubMed record links a retraction. This catalog does not present the publication as reliable practical guidance.
Keep in mind: Checking bibliographic metadata does not verify a study’s conclusions or any advice previously linked to it.
Study details & source ↗Retracted paper
✓ Read
Randomized controlled trial · J Gerontol B Psychol Sci Soc Sci · 2016. Source record refreshed; an explanation has not been reviewed.
Randomized controlled trial2016
About this paper ＋
This page identifies the publication and its source. A checked explanation of its findings is not yet available.
Keep in mind: Checking bibliographic metadata does not verify a study’s conclusions or any advice previously linked to it.
Study details & source ↗Paper record
✓ Read
Meta-analysis · Breast Cancer · 2016. Source record refreshed; an explanation has not been reviewed.
Meta-analysis2016
About this paper ＋
This page identifies the publication and its source. A checked explanation of its findings is not yet available.
Keep in mind: Checking bibliographic metadata does not verify a study’s conclusions or any advice previously linked to it.
Study details & source ↗Paper record
✓ Read
Study design not specified in the source record · BJU Int · 2016. Source record refreshed; an explanation has not been reviewed.
Study design not specified in the source record2016
About this paper ＋
This page identifies the publication and its source. A checked explanation of its findings is not yet available.
Keep in mind: Checking bibliographic metadata does not verify a study’s conclusions or any advice previously linked to it.
Study details & source ↗Paper record
✓ Read