Meta-analysis · Nature · 2015. Source record refreshed; an explanation has not been reviewed.
Meta-analysis2015
About this paper ＋
This page identifies the publication and its source. A checked explanation of its findings is not yet available.
Keep in mind: Checking bibliographic metadata does not verify a study’s conclusions or any advice previously linked to it.
Study details & source ↗Paper record
✓ Read
Randomized controlled trial · Appl Psychophysiol Biofeedback · 2015. Source record refreshed; an explanation has not been reviewed.
Randomized controlled trial2015
About this paper ＋
This page identifies the publication and its source. A checked explanation of its findings is not yet available.
Keep in mind: Checking bibliographic metadata does not verify a study’s conclusions or any advice previously linked to it.
Study details & source ↗Paper record
✓ Read
Systematic review · J Affect Disord · 2015. Source record refreshed; an explanation has not been reviewed.
Systematic review2015
About this paper ＋
This page identifies the publication and its source. A checked explanation of its findings is not yet available.
Keep in mind: Checking bibliographic metadata does not verify a study’s conclusions or any advice previously linked to it.
Study details & source ↗Paper record
✓ Read
Meta-analysis · Ann Intern Med · 2015. Source record refreshed; an explanation has not been reviewed.
Meta-analysis2015
About this paper ＋
This page identifies the publication and its source. A checked explanation of its findings is not yet available.
Keep in mind: Checking bibliographic metadata does not verify a study’s conclusions or any advice previously linked to it.
Study details & source ↗Paper record
✓ Read
Systematic review · Adv Mind Body Med · 2015. Source record refreshed; an explanation has not been reviewed.
Systematic review2015
About this paper ＋
This page identifies the publication and its source. A checked explanation of its findings is not yet available.
Keep in mind: Checking bibliographic metadata does not verify a study’s conclusions or any advice previously linked to it.
Study details & source ↗Paper record
✓ Read
Randomized controlled trial · Altern Ther Health Med · 2015. Source record refreshed; an explanation has not been reviewed.
Randomized controlled trial2015
About this paper ＋
This page identifies the publication and its source. A checked explanation of its findings is not yet available.
Keep in mind: Checking bibliographic metadata does not verify a study’s conclusions or any advice previously linked to it.
Study details & source ↗Paper record
✓ Read
Study design not specified in the source record · Front Hum Neurosci · 2015. Source record refreshed; an explanation has not been reviewed.
Study design not specified in the source record2015
About this paper ＋
This page identifies the publication and its source. A checked explanation of its findings is not yet available.
Keep in mind: Checking bibliographic metadata does not verify a study’s conclusions or any advice previously linked to it.
Study details & source ↗Paper record
✓ Read
Randomized controlled trial · J Korean Acad Nurs · 2015. Source record refreshed; an explanation has not been reviewed.
Randomized controlled trial2015
About this paper ＋
This page identifies the publication and its source. A checked explanation of its findings is not yet available.
Keep in mind: Checking bibliographic metadata does not verify a study’s conclusions or any advice previously linked to it.
Study details & source ↗Paper record
✓ Read
Randomized controlled trial · Aerosp Med Hum Perform · 2015. Source record refreshed; an explanation has not been reviewed.
Randomized controlled trial2015
About this paper ＋
This page identifies the publication and its source. A checked explanation of its findings is not yet available.
Keep in mind: Checking bibliographic metadata does not verify a study’s conclusions or any advice previously linked to it.
Study details & source ↗Paper record
✓ Read
Systematic review · J Affect Disord · 2015. Source record refreshed; an explanation has not been reviewed.
Systematic review2015
About this paper ＋
This page identifies the publication and its source. A checked explanation of its findings is not yet available.
Keep in mind: Checking bibliographic metadata does not verify a study’s conclusions or any advice previously linked to it.
Study details & source ↗Paper record
✓ Read
Randomized controlled trial · Psychiatr Serv · 2015. Source record refreshed; an explanation has not been reviewed.
Randomized controlled trial2015
About this paper ＋
This page identifies the publication and its source. A checked explanation of its findings is not yet available.
Keep in mind: Checking bibliographic metadata does not verify a study’s conclusions or any advice previously linked to it.
Study details & source ↗Paper record
✓ Read
This publication is retracted. Read the source notice before using its findings.
Meta-analysis2015
About this paper ＋
The current PubMed record links a retraction. This catalog does not present the publication as reliable practical guidance.
Keep in mind: Checking bibliographic metadata does not verify a study’s conclusions or any advice previously linked to it.
Study details & source ↗Retracted paper
✓ Read
Meta-analysis · J Psychosom Res · 2015. Source record refreshed; an explanation has not been reviewed.
Meta-analysis2015
About this paper ＋
This page identifies the publication and its source. A checked explanation of its findings is not yet available.
Keep in mind: Checking bibliographic metadata does not verify a study’s conclusions or any advice previously linked to it.
Study details & source ↗Paper record
✓ Read
Randomized controlled trial · JAMA Intern Med · 2015. Source record refreshed; an explanation has not been reviewed.
Randomized controlled trial2015
About this paper ＋
This page identifies the publication and its source. A checked explanation of its findings is not yet available.
Keep in mind: Checking bibliographic metadata does not verify a study’s conclusions or any advice previously linked to it.
Study details & source ↗Paper record
✓ Read
Meta-analysis · Health Psychol Rev · 2015. Source record refreshed; an explanation has not been reviewed.
Meta-analysis2015
About this paper ＋
This page identifies the publication and its source. A checked explanation of its findings is not yet available.
Keep in mind: Checking bibliographic metadata does not verify a study’s conclusions or any advice previously linked to it.
Study details & source ↗Paper record
✓ Read
Systematic review · Health Technol Assess · 2015. Source record refreshed; an explanation has not been reviewed.
Systematic review2015
About this paper ＋
This page identifies the publication and its source. A checked explanation of its findings is not yet available.
Keep in mind: Checking bibliographic metadata does not verify a study’s conclusions or any advice previously linked to it.
Study details & source ↗Paper record
✓ Read
Review · BMJ · 2015. Source record refreshed; an explanation has not been reviewed.
Review2015
About this paper ＋
This page identifies the publication and its source. A checked explanation of its findings is not yet available.
Keep in mind: Checking bibliographic metadata does not verify a study’s conclusions or any advice previously linked to it.
Study details & source ↗Paper record
✓ Read
Randomized controlled trial · Poult Sci · 2015. Source record refreshed; an explanation has not been reviewed.
Randomized controlled trial2015
About this paper ＋
This page identifies the publication and its source. A checked explanation of its findings is not yet available.
Keep in mind: Checking bibliographic metadata does not verify a study’s conclusions or any advice previously linked to it.
Study details & source ↗Paper record
✓ Read
Meta-analysis · J Epidemiol Community Health · 2015. Source record refreshed; an explanation has not been reviewed.
Meta-analysis2015
About this paper ＋
This page identifies the publication and its source. A checked explanation of its findings is not yet available.
Keep in mind: Checking bibliographic metadata does not verify a study’s conclusions or any advice previously linked to it.
Study details & source ↗Paper record
✓ Read
Meta-analysis · Clin Psychol Rev · 2015. Source record refreshed; an explanation has not been reviewed.
Meta-analysis2015
About this paper ＋
This page identifies the publication and its source. A checked explanation of its findings is not yet available.
Keep in mind: Checking bibliographic metadata does not verify a study’s conclusions or any advice previously linked to it.
Study details & source ↗Paper record
✓ Read
Meta-analysis · BMC Psychiatry · 2015. Source record refreshed; an explanation has not been reviewed.
Meta-analysis2015
About this paper ＋
This page identifies the publication and its source. A checked explanation of its findings is not yet available.
Keep in mind: Checking bibliographic metadata does not verify a study’s conclusions or any advice previously linked to it.
Study details & source ↗Paper record
✓ Read
Meta-analysis · J Affect Disord · 2015. Source record refreshed; an explanation has not been reviewed.
Meta-analysis2015
About this paper ＋
This page identifies the publication and its source. A checked explanation of its findings is not yet available.
Keep in mind: Checking bibliographic metadata does not verify a study’s conclusions or any advice previously linked to it.
Study details & source ↗Paper record
✓ Read
Randomized controlled trial · J Transl Med · 2015. Source record refreshed; an explanation has not been reviewed.
Randomized controlled trial2015
About this paper ＋
This page identifies the publication and its source. A checked explanation of its findings is not yet available.
Keep in mind: Checking bibliographic metadata does not verify a study’s conclusions or any advice previously linked to it.
Study details & source ↗Paper record
✓ Read
Meta-analysis · Cochrane Database Syst Rev · 2015. Source record refreshed; an explanation has not been reviewed.
Meta-analysis2015
About this paper ＋
This page identifies the publication and its source. A checked explanation of its findings is not yet available.
Keep in mind: Checking bibliographic metadata does not verify a study’s conclusions or any advice previously linked to it.
Study details & source ↗Paper record
✓ Read