Randomized controlled trial · J Aging Health · 2013. Source record refreshed; an explanation has not been reviewed.
Randomized controlled trial2013
About this paper +
This page identifies the publication and its source. A checked explanation of its findings is not yet available.
Keep in mind: Checking bibliographic metadata does not verify a study’s conclusions or any advice previously linked to it.
Study details & source ↗
Paper record
✓ Read
Meta-analysis · Psychooncology · 2013. Source record refreshed; an explanation has not been reviewed.
Meta-analysis2013
About this paper +
This page identifies the publication and its source. A checked explanation of its findings is not yet available.
Keep in mind: Checking bibliographic metadata does not verify a study’s conclusions or any advice previously linked to it.
Study details & source ↗
Paper record
✓ Read
Randomized controlled trial · J Gerontol B Psychol Sci Soc Sci · 2013. Source record refreshed; an explanation has not been reviewed.
Randomized controlled trial2013
About this paper +
This page identifies the publication and its source. A checked explanation of its findings is not yet available.
Keep in mind: Checking bibliographic metadata does not verify a study’s conclusions or any advice previously linked to it.
Study details & source ↗
Paper record
✓ Read
Study design not specified in the source record · Soc Sci Med · 2013. Source record refreshed; an explanation has not been reviewed.
Study design not specified in the source record2013
About this paper +
This page identifies the publication and its source. A checked explanation of its findings is not yet available.
Keep in mind: Checking bibliographic metadata does not verify a study’s conclusions or any advice previously linked to it.
Study details & source ↗
Paper record
✓ Read
Randomized controlled trial · Clin Rehabil · 2013. Source record refreshed; an explanation has not been reviewed.
Randomized controlled trial2013
About this paper +
This page identifies the publication and its source. A checked explanation of its findings is not yet available.
Keep in mind: Checking bibliographic metadata does not verify a study’s conclusions or any advice previously linked to it.
Study details & source ↗
Paper record
✓ Read
Meta-analysis · Dev Psychol · 2013. Source record refreshed; an explanation has not been reviewed.
Meta-analysis2013
About this paper +
This page identifies the publication and its source. A checked explanation of its findings is not yet available.
Keep in mind: Checking bibliographic metadata does not verify a study’s conclusions or any advice previously linked to it.
Study details & source ↗
Paper record
✓ Read
Study design not specified in the source record · Ther Adv Psychopharmacol · 2012. Source record refreshed; an explanation has not been reviewed.
Study design not specified in the source record2012
About this paper +
This page identifies the publication and its source. A checked explanation of its findings is not yet available.
Keep in mind: Checking bibliographic metadata does not verify a study’s conclusions or any advice previously linked to it.
Study details & source ↗
Paper record
✓ Read
Meta-analysis (title) · Curr Oncol · 2012. Source record refreshed; an explanation has not been reviewed.
Meta-analysis (title)2012
About this paper +
This page identifies the publication and its source. A checked explanation of its findings is not yet available.
Keep in mind: Checking bibliographic metadata does not verify a study’s conclusions or any advice previously linked to it.
Study details & source ↗
Paper record
✓ Read
Meta-analysis · BMC Neurol · 2012. Source record refreshed; an explanation has not been reviewed.
Meta-analysis2012
About this paper +
This page identifies the publication and its source. A checked explanation of its findings is not yet available.
Keep in mind: Checking bibliographic metadata does not verify a study’s conclusions or any advice previously linked to it.
Study details & source ↗
Paper record
✓ Read
Meta-analysis · Cochrane Database Syst Rev · 2012. Source record refreshed; an explanation has not been reviewed.
Meta-analysis2012
About this paper +
This page identifies the publication and its source. A checked explanation of its findings is not yet available.
Keep in mind: Checking bibliographic metadata does not verify a study’s conclusions or any advice previously linked to it.
Study details & source ↗
Paper record
✓ Read
Meta-analysis · Cochrane Database Syst Rev · 2012. Source record refreshed; an explanation has not been reviewed.
Meta-analysis2012
About this paper +
This page identifies the publication and its source. A checked explanation of its findings is not yet available.
Keep in mind: Checking bibliographic metadata does not verify a study’s conclusions or any advice previously linked to it.
Study details & source ↗
Paper record
✓ Read
Meta-analysis · Support Care Cancer · 2012. Source record refreshed; an explanation has not been reviewed.
Meta-analysis2012
About this paper +
This page identifies the publication and its source. A checked explanation of its findings is not yet available.
Keep in mind: Checking bibliographic metadata does not verify a study’s conclusions or any advice previously linked to it.
Study details & source ↗
Paper record
✓ Read
Review · Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A · 2012. Source record refreshed; an explanation has not been reviewed.
Review2012
About this paper +
This page identifies the publication and its source. A checked explanation of its findings is not yet available.
Keep in mind: Checking bibliographic metadata does not verify a study’s conclusions or any advice previously linked to it.
Study details & source ↗
Paper record
✓ Read
Meta-analysis · J Am Coll Cardiol · 2012. Source record refreshed; an explanation has not been reviewed.
Meta-analysis2012
About this paper +
This page identifies the publication and its source. A checked explanation of its findings is not yet available.
Keep in mind: Checking bibliographic metadata does not verify a study’s conclusions or any advice previously linked to it.
Study details & source ↗
Paper record
✓ Read
Meta-analysis · J Korean Acad Nurs · 2012. Source record refreshed; an explanation has not been reviewed.
Meta-analysis2012
About this paper +
This page identifies the publication and its source. A checked explanation of its findings is not yet available.
Keep in mind: Checking bibliographic metadata does not verify a study’s conclusions or any advice previously linked to it.
Study details & source ↗
Paper record
✓ Read
Meta-analysis · Cochrane Database Syst Rev · 2012. Source record refreshed; an explanation has not been reviewed.
Meta-analysis2012
About this paper +
This page identifies the publication and its source. A checked explanation of its findings is not yet available.
Keep in mind: Checking bibliographic metadata does not verify a study’s conclusions or any advice previously linked to it.
Study details & source ↗
Paper record
✓ Read
Study design not specified in the source record · Psychol Sci · 2012. Source record refreshed; an explanation has not been reviewed.
Study design not specified in the source record2012
About this paper +
This page identifies the publication and its source. A checked explanation of its findings is not yet available.
Keep in mind: Checking bibliographic metadata does not verify a study’s conclusions or any advice previously linked to it.
Study details & source ↗
Paper record
✓ Read
Study design not specified in the source record · Behav Res Ther · 2012. Source record refreshed; an explanation has not been reviewed.
Study design not specified in the source record2012
About this paper +
This page identifies the publication and its source. A checked explanation of its findings is not yet available.
Keep in mind: Checking bibliographic metadata does not verify a study’s conclusions or any advice previously linked to it.
Study details & source ↗
Paper record
✓ Read
Study design not specified in the source record · Psychol Sci · 2012. Source record refreshed; an explanation has not been reviewed.
Study design not specified in the source record2012
About this paper +
This page identifies the publication and its source. A checked explanation of its findings is not yet available.
Keep in mind: Checking bibliographic metadata does not verify a study’s conclusions or any advice previously linked to it.
Study details & source ↗
Paper record
✓ Read
Randomized controlled trial · Trials · 2012. Source record refreshed; an explanation has not been reviewed.
Randomized controlled trial2012
About this paper +
This page identifies the publication and its source. A checked explanation of its findings is not yet available.
Keep in mind: Checking bibliographic metadata does not verify a study’s conclusions or any advice previously linked to it.
Study details & source ↗
Paper record
✓ Read
Systematic review · Psychiatr Serv · 2012. Source record refreshed; an explanation has not been reviewed.
Systematic review2012
About this paper +
This page identifies the publication and its source. A checked explanation of its findings is not yet available.
Keep in mind: Checking bibliographic metadata does not verify a study’s conclusions or any advice previously linked to it.
Study details & source ↗
Paper record
✓ Read
Systematic review · Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech · 2012. Source record refreshed; an explanation has not been reviewed.
Systematic review2012
About this paper +
This page identifies the publication and its source. A checked explanation of its findings is not yet available.
Keep in mind: Checking bibliographic metadata does not verify a study’s conclusions or any advice previously linked to it.
Study details & source ↗
Paper record
✓ Read
Randomized controlled trial · Eur J Phys Rehabil Med · 2012. Source record refreshed; an explanation has not been reviewed.
Randomized controlled trial2012
About this paper +
This page identifies the publication and its source. A checked explanation of its findings is not yet available.
Keep in mind: Checking bibliographic metadata does not verify a study’s conclusions or any advice previously linked to it.
Study details & source ↗
Paper record
✓ Read
Review · Nat Rev Neurol · 2012. Source record refreshed; an explanation has not been reviewed.
Review2012
About this paper +
This page identifies the publication and its source. A checked explanation of its findings is not yet available.
Keep in mind: Checking bibliographic metadata does not verify a study’s conclusions or any advice previously linked to it.
Study details & source ↗
Paper record
✓ Read