A review pooled symptom frequencies from South American studies. Its results describe symptoms among studied patients, with substantial differences between studies complicating interpretation.
Systematic review and meta-analysis including 10 studies.2025
30-second takeaway ＋
Headache, muscle pain, and eye pain were frequently reported among patients with Oropouche virus infection in the included studies. These pooled symptom estimates describe the studied populations and may not apply equally elsewhere. Although the review frames its question around neurological manifestations, the reported symptom frequencies do not establish the frequency of severe neurological complications.
Keep in mind: The studies differed substantially, with geography and diagnostic methods suggested as explanations. The abstract does not report symptom assessment timing or confidence intervals, and the geographic coverage limits generalization.
Study details & source ↗Abstract-based explanation
✓ Read
Randomized controlled trial · Public Health · 2026. Source record refreshed; an explanation has not been reviewed.
Randomized controlled trial2026
About this paper ＋
This page identifies the publication and its source. A checked explanation of its findings is not yet available.
Keep in mind: Checking bibliographic metadata does not verify a study’s conclusions or any advice previously linked to it.
Study details & source ↗Paper record
✓ Read
Randomized controlled trial · Nat Aging · 2025. Source record refreshed; an explanation has not been reviewed.
Randomized controlled trial2025
About this paper ＋
This page identifies the publication and its source. A checked explanation of its findings is not yet available.
Keep in mind: Checking bibliographic metadata does not verify a study’s conclusions or any advice previously linked to it.
Study details & source ↗Paper record
✓ Read
Meta-analysis · Zhonghua Wei Zhong Bing Ji Jiu Yi Xue · 2025. Source record refreshed; an explanation has not been reviewed.
Meta-analysis2025
About this paper ＋
This page identifies the publication and its source. A checked explanation of its findings is not yet available.
Keep in mind: Checking bibliographic metadata does not verify a study’s conclusions or any advice previously linked to it.
Study details & source ↗Paper record
✓ Read
Meta-analysis · Cell Mol Neurobiol · 2025. Source record refreshed; an explanation has not been reviewed.
Meta-analysis2025
About this paper ＋
This page identifies the publication and its source. A checked explanation of its findings is not yet available.
Keep in mind: Checking bibliographic metadata does not verify a study’s conclusions or any advice previously linked to it.
Study details & source ↗Paper record
✓ Read
Systematic review · Neurol Sci · 2025. Source record refreshed; an explanation has not been reviewed.
Systematic review2025
About this paper ＋
This page identifies the publication and its source. A checked explanation of its findings is not yet available.
Keep in mind: Checking bibliographic metadata does not verify a study’s conclusions or any advice previously linked to it.
Study details & source ↗Paper record
✓ Read
Meta-analysis · J Natl Cancer Inst · 2025. Source record refreshed; an explanation has not been reviewed.
Meta-analysis2025
About this paper ＋
This page identifies the publication and its source. A checked explanation of its findings is not yet available.
Keep in mind: Checking bibliographic metadata does not verify a study’s conclusions or any advice previously linked to it.
Study details & source ↗Paper record
✓ Read
Meta-analysis · Future Oncol · 2025. Source record refreshed; an explanation has not been reviewed.
Meta-analysis2025
About this paper ＋
This page identifies the publication and its source. A checked explanation of its findings is not yet available.
Keep in mind: Checking bibliographic metadata does not verify a study’s conclusions or any advice previously linked to it.
Study details & source ↗Paper record
✓ Read
Systematic review · J Phys Act Health · 2025. Source record refreshed; an explanation has not been reviewed.
Systematic review2025
About this paper ＋
This page identifies the publication and its source. A checked explanation of its findings is not yet available.
Keep in mind: Checking bibliographic metadata does not verify a study’s conclusions or any advice previously linked to it.
Study details & source ↗Paper record
✓ Read
Meta-analysis · Med Educ · 2025. Source record refreshed; an explanation has not been reviewed.
Meta-analysis2025
About this paper ＋
This page identifies the publication and its source. A checked explanation of its findings is not yet available.
Keep in mind: Checking bibliographic metadata does not verify a study’s conclusions or any advice previously linked to it.
Study details & source ↗Paper record
✓ Read
Systematic review · Int J Environ Res Public Health · 2025. Source record refreshed; an explanation has not been reviewed.
Systematic review2025
About this paper ＋
This page identifies the publication and its source. A checked explanation of its findings is not yet available.
Keep in mind: Checking bibliographic metadata does not verify a study’s conclusions or any advice previously linked to it.
Study details & source ↗Paper record
✓ Read
Systematic review · Front Immunol · 2025. Source record refreshed; an explanation has not been reviewed.
Systematic review2025
About this paper ＋
This page identifies the publication and its source. A checked explanation of its findings is not yet available.
Keep in mind: Checking bibliographic metadata does not verify a study’s conclusions or any advice previously linked to it.
Study details & source ↗Paper record
✓ Read
Randomized controlled trial · Int J Mol Sci · 2025. Source record refreshed; an explanation has not been reviewed.
Randomized controlled trial2025
About this paper ＋
This page identifies the publication and its source. A checked explanation of its findings is not yet available.
Keep in mind: Checking bibliographic metadata does not verify a study’s conclusions or any advice previously linked to it.
Study details & source ↗Paper record
✓ Read
Systematic review · J Bodyw Mov Ther · 2025. Source record refreshed; an explanation has not been reviewed.
Systematic review2025
About this paper ＋
This page identifies the publication and its source. A checked explanation of its findings is not yet available.
Keep in mind: Checking bibliographic metadata does not verify a study’s conclusions or any advice previously linked to it.
Study details & source ↗Paper record
✓ Read
Randomized controlled trial · Sci Rep · 2025. Source record refreshed; an explanation has not been reviewed.
Randomized controlled trial2025
About this paper ＋
This page identifies the publication and its source. A checked explanation of its findings is not yet available.
Keep in mind: Checking bibliographic metadata does not verify a study’s conclusions or any advice previously linked to it.
Study details & source ↗Paper record
✓ Read
Systematic review · Riv Psichiatr · 2025. Source record refreshed; an explanation has not been reviewed.
Systematic review2025
About this paper ＋
This page identifies the publication and its source. A checked explanation of its findings is not yet available.
Keep in mind: Checking bibliographic metadata does not verify a study’s conclusions or any advice previously linked to it.
Study details & source ↗Paper record
✓ Read
Meta-analysis · Virol J · 2025. Source record refreshed; an explanation has not been reviewed.
Meta-analysis2025
About this paper ＋
This page identifies the publication and its source. A checked explanation of its findings is not yet available.
Keep in mind: Checking bibliographic metadata does not verify a study’s conclusions or any advice previously linked to it.
Study details & source ↗Paper record
✓ Read
Meta-analysis · Lancet Respir Med · 2025. Source record refreshed; an explanation has not been reviewed.
Meta-analysis2025
About this paper ＋
This page identifies the publication and its source. A checked explanation of its findings is not yet available.
Keep in mind: Checking bibliographic metadata does not verify a study’s conclusions or any advice previously linked to it.
Study details & source ↗Paper record
✓ Read
Meta-analysis · Environ Pollut · 2025. Source record refreshed; an explanation has not been reviewed.
Meta-analysis2025
About this paper ＋
This page identifies the publication and its source. A checked explanation of its findings is not yet available.
Keep in mind: Checking bibliographic metadata does not verify a study’s conclusions or any advice previously linked to it.
Study details & source ↗Paper record
✓ Read
Meta-analysis · Ann Clin Microbiol Antimicrob · 2025. Source record refreshed; an explanation has not been reviewed.
Meta-analysis2025
About this paper ＋
This page identifies the publication and its source. A checked explanation of its findings is not yet available.
Keep in mind: Checking bibliographic metadata does not verify a study’s conclusions or any advice previously linked to it.
Study details & source ↗Paper record
✓ Read
Meta-analysis · BMC Health Serv Res · 2025. Source record refreshed; an explanation has not been reviewed.
Meta-analysis2025
About this paper ＋
This page identifies the publication and its source. A checked explanation of its findings is not yet available.
Keep in mind: Checking bibliographic metadata does not verify a study’s conclusions or any advice previously linked to it.
Study details & source ↗Paper record
✓ Read
Systematic review · Syst Rev · 2025. Source record refreshed; an explanation has not been reviewed.
Systematic review2025
About this paper ＋
This page identifies the publication and its source. A checked explanation of its findings is not yet available.
Keep in mind: Checking bibliographic metadata does not verify a study’s conclusions or any advice previously linked to it.
Study details & source ↗Paper record
✓ Read
Meta-analysis · Clin Nutr ESPEN · 2025. Source record refreshed; an explanation has not been reviewed.
Meta-analysis2025
About this paper ＋
This page identifies the publication and its source. A checked explanation of its findings is not yet available.
Keep in mind: Checking bibliographic metadata does not verify a study’s conclusions or any advice previously linked to it.
Study details & source ↗Paper record
✓ Read
Meta-analysis · BMC Pulm Med · 2025. Source record refreshed; an explanation has not been reviewed.
Meta-analysis2025
About this paper ＋
This page identifies the publication and its source. A checked explanation of its findings is not yet available.
Keep in mind: Checking bibliographic metadata does not verify a study’s conclusions or any advice previously linked to it.
Study details & source ↗Paper record
✓ Read