Food, drinks, eating patterns and metabolism.
Short explanations show the finding and its limits. Paper records link you to the source.
2,216 results to explore
Systematic review · Minerva Anestesiol · 2009. Source record refreshed; an explanation has not been reviewed.
This page identifies the publication and its source. A checked explanation of its findings is not yet available.
Keep in mind: Checking bibliographic metadata does not verify a study’s conclusions or any advice previously linked to it.
Study details & source ↗Paper record
✓ ReadSystematic review · BMJ Clin Evid · 2008. Source record refreshed; an explanation has not been reviewed.
This page identifies the publication and its source. A checked explanation of its findings is not yet available.
Keep in mind: Checking bibliographic metadata does not verify a study’s conclusions or any advice previously linked to it.
Study details & source ↗Paper record
✓ ReadMeta-analysis · Wien Klin Wochenschr · 2008. Source record refreshed; an explanation has not been reviewed.
This page identifies the publication and its source. A checked explanation of its findings is not yet available.
Keep in mind: Checking bibliographic metadata does not verify a study’s conclusions or any advice previously linked to it.
Study details & source ↗Paper record
✓ ReadRandomized controlled trial · J Atheroscler Thromb · 2008. Source record refreshed; an explanation has not been reviewed.
This page identifies the publication and its source. A checked explanation of its findings is not yet available.
Keep in mind: Checking bibliographic metadata does not verify a study’s conclusions or any advice previously linked to it.
Study details & source ↗Paper record
✓ ReadMeta-analysis · Cochrane Database Syst Rev · 2008. Source record refreshed; an explanation has not been reviewed.
This page identifies the publication and its source. A checked explanation of its findings is not yet available.
Keep in mind: Checking bibliographic metadata does not verify a study’s conclusions or any advice previously linked to it.
Study details & source ↗Paper record
✓ ReadMeta-analysis · Cochrane Database Syst Rev · 2008. Source record refreshed; an explanation has not been reviewed.
This page identifies the publication and its source. A checked explanation of its findings is not yet available.
Keep in mind: Checking bibliographic metadata does not verify a study’s conclusions or any advice previously linked to it.
Study details & source ↗Paper record
✓ ReadMeta-analysis · Ann Intern Med · 2008. Source record refreshed; an explanation has not been reviewed.
This page identifies the publication and its source. A checked explanation of its findings is not yet available.
Keep in mind: Checking bibliographic metadata does not verify a study’s conclusions or any advice previously linked to it.
Study details & source ↗Paper record
✓ ReadRandomized controlled trial · Saudi Med J · 2008. Source record refreshed; an explanation has not been reviewed.
This page identifies the publication and its source. A checked explanation of its findings is not yet available.
Keep in mind: Checking bibliographic metadata does not verify a study’s conclusions or any advice previously linked to it.
Study details & source ↗Paper record
✓ ReadMeta-analysis · BMJ · 2008. Source record refreshed; an explanation has not been reviewed.
This page identifies the publication and its source. A checked explanation of its findings is not yet available.
Keep in mind: Checking bibliographic metadata does not verify a study’s conclusions or any advice previously linked to it.
Study details & source ↗Paper record
✓ ReadMeta-analysis · Am Heart J · 2008. Source record refreshed; an explanation has not been reviewed.
This page identifies the publication and its source. A checked explanation of its findings is not yet available.
Keep in mind: Checking bibliographic metadata does not verify a study’s conclusions or any advice previously linked to it.
Study details & source ↗Paper record
✓ ReadStudy design not specified in the source record · J Agric Food Chem · 2008. Source record refreshed; an explanation has not been reviewed.
This page identifies the publication and its source. A checked explanation of its findings is not yet available.
Keep in mind: Checking bibliographic metadata does not verify a study’s conclusions or any advice previously linked to it.
Study details & source ↗Paper record
✓ ReadMeta-analysis · Arch Ophthalmol · 2008. Source record refreshed; an explanation has not been reviewed.
This page identifies the publication and its source. A checked explanation of its findings is not yet available.
Keep in mind: Checking bibliographic metadata does not verify a study’s conclusions or any advice previously linked to it.
Study details & source ↗Paper record
✓ ReadMeta-analysis · Am J Clin Nutr · 2008. Source record refreshed; an explanation has not been reviewed.
This page identifies the publication and its source. A checked explanation of its findings is not yet available.
Keep in mind: Checking bibliographic metadata does not verify a study’s conclusions or any advice previously linked to it.
Study details & source ↗Paper record
✓ ReadMeta-analysis · Cochrane Database Syst Rev · 2008. Source record refreshed; an explanation has not been reviewed.
This page identifies the publication and its source. A checked explanation of its findings is not yet available.
Keep in mind: Checking bibliographic metadata does not verify a study’s conclusions or any advice previously linked to it.
Study details & source ↗Paper record
✓ ReadSystematic review · Cochrane Database Syst Rev · 2008. Source record refreshed; an explanation has not been reviewed.
This page identifies the publication and its source. A checked explanation of its findings is not yet available.
Keep in mind: Checking bibliographic metadata does not verify a study’s conclusions or any advice previously linked to it.
Study details & source ↗Paper record
✓ ReadMeta-analysis · Int J Cancer · 2008. Source record refreshed; an explanation has not been reviewed.
This page identifies the publication and its source. A checked explanation of its findings is not yet available.
Keep in mind: Checking bibliographic metadata does not verify a study’s conclusions or any advice previously linked to it.
Study details & source ↗Paper record
✓ ReadRandomized controlled trial · Acta Diabetol · 2008. Source record refreshed; an explanation has not been reviewed.
This page identifies the publication and its source. A checked explanation of its findings is not yet available.
Keep in mind: Checking bibliographic metadata does not verify a study’s conclusions or any advice previously linked to it.
Study details & source ↗Paper record
✓ ReadSystematic review · BMJ Clin Evid · 2007. Source record refreshed; an explanation has not been reviewed.
This page identifies the publication and its source. A checked explanation of its findings is not yet available.
Keep in mind: Checking bibliographic metadata does not verify a study’s conclusions or any advice previously linked to it.
Study details & source ↗Paper record
✓ ReadMeta-analysis · Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd · 2007. Source record refreshed; an explanation has not been reviewed.
This page identifies the publication and its source. A checked explanation of its findings is not yet available.
Keep in mind: Checking bibliographic metadata does not verify a study’s conclusions or any advice previously linked to it.
Study details & source ↗Paper record
✓ ReadRandomized controlled trial · Med Sci Sports Exerc · 2007. Source record refreshed; an explanation has not been reviewed.
This page identifies the publication and its source. A checked explanation of its findings is not yet available.
Keep in mind: Checking bibliographic metadata does not verify a study’s conclusions or any advice previously linked to it.
Study details & source ↗Paper record
✓ ReadSystematic review · J Am Geriatr Soc · 2007. Source record refreshed; an explanation has not been reviewed.
This page identifies the publication and its source. A checked explanation of its findings is not yet available.
Keep in mind: Checking bibliographic metadata does not verify a study’s conclusions or any advice previously linked to it.
Study details & source ↗Paper record
✓ ReadMeta-analysis · Rev Med Liege · 2007. Source record refreshed; an explanation has not been reviewed.
This page identifies the publication and its source. A checked explanation of its findings is not yet available.
Keep in mind: Checking bibliographic metadata does not verify a study’s conclusions or any advice previously linked to it.
Study details & source ↗Paper record
✓ ReadMeta-analysis · Cochrane Database Syst Rev · 2007. Source record refreshed; an explanation has not been reviewed.
This page identifies the publication and its source. A checked explanation of its findings is not yet available.
Keep in mind: Checking bibliographic metadata does not verify a study’s conclusions or any advice previously linked to it.
Study details & source ↗Paper record
✓ ReadMeta-analysis · Cochrane Database Syst Rev · 2007. Source record refreshed; an explanation has not been reviewed.
This page identifies the publication and its source. A checked explanation of its findings is not yet available.
Keep in mind: Checking bibliographic metadata does not verify a study’s conclusions or any advice previously linked to it.
Study details & source ↗Paper record
✓ ReadTry a broader word, or explore another topic.
Topics help you browse; they are not clinical recommendations. What our review labels mean ↗