Food, drinks, eating patterns and metabolism.
Short explanations show the finding and its limits. Paper records link you to the source.
2,216 results to explore
This source has an expression of concern. Its findings need additional review.
The current PubMed record links an expression of concern. No practical takeaway is approved here.
Keep in mind: Checking bibliographic metadata does not verify a study’s conclusions or any advice previously linked to it.
Study details & source ↗Paper record
✓ ReadRandomized controlled trial · J Pharmacol Exp Ther · 2003. Source record refreshed; an explanation has not been reviewed.
This page identifies the publication and its source. A checked explanation of its findings is not yet available.
Keep in mind: Checking bibliographic metadata does not verify a study’s conclusions or any advice previously linked to it.
Study details & source ↗Paper record
✓ ReadRandomized controlled trial · Br J Nutr · 2003. Source record refreshed; an explanation has not been reviewed.
This page identifies the publication and its source. A checked explanation of its findings is not yet available.
Keep in mind: Checking bibliographic metadata does not verify a study’s conclusions or any advice previously linked to it.
Study details & source ↗Paper record
✓ ReadMeta-analysis · Eur J Epidemiol · 2003. Source record refreshed; an explanation has not been reviewed.
This page identifies the publication and its source. A checked explanation of its findings is not yet available.
Keep in mind: Checking bibliographic metadata does not verify a study’s conclusions or any advice previously linked to it.
Study details & source ↗Paper record
✓ ReadMeta-analysis · Lancet · 2003. Source record refreshed; an explanation has not been reviewed.
This page identifies the publication and its source. A checked explanation of its findings is not yet available.
Keep in mind: Checking bibliographic metadata does not verify a study’s conclusions or any advice previously linked to it.
Study details & source ↗Paper record
✓ ReadMeta-analysis · Addiction · 2003. Source record refreshed; an explanation has not been reviewed.
This page identifies the publication and its source. A checked explanation of its findings is not yet available.
Keep in mind: Checking bibliographic metadata does not verify a study’s conclusions or any advice previously linked to it.
Study details & source ↗Paper record
✓ ReadMeta-analysis · Eur J Clin Nutr · 2003. Source record refreshed; an explanation has not been reviewed.
This page identifies the publication and its source. A checked explanation of its findings is not yet available.
Keep in mind: Checking bibliographic metadata does not verify a study’s conclusions or any advice previously linked to it.
Study details & source ↗Paper record
✓ ReadMeta-analysis · World J Gastroenterol · 2003. Source record refreshed; an explanation has not been reviewed.
This page identifies the publication and its source. A checked explanation of its findings is not yet available.
Keep in mind: Checking bibliographic metadata does not verify a study’s conclusions or any advice previously linked to it.
Study details & source ↗Paper record
✓ ReadSystematic review · Am J Clin Nutr · 2003. Source record refreshed; an explanation has not been reviewed.
This page identifies the publication and its source. A checked explanation of its findings is not yet available.
Keep in mind: Checking bibliographic metadata does not verify a study’s conclusions or any advice previously linked to it.
Study details & source ↗Paper record
✓ ReadMeta-analysis · J Am Acad Nurse Pract · 2003. Source record refreshed; an explanation has not been reviewed.
This page identifies the publication and its source. A checked explanation of its findings is not yet available.
Keep in mind: Checking bibliographic metadata does not verify a study’s conclusions or any advice previously linked to it.
Study details & source ↗Paper record
✓ ReadMeta-analysis · Toxicol Ind Health · 2002. Source record refreshed; an explanation has not been reviewed.
This page identifies the publication and its source. A checked explanation of its findings is not yet available.
Keep in mind: Checking bibliographic metadata does not verify a study’s conclusions or any advice previously linked to it.
Study details & source ↗Paper record
✓ ReadRandomized controlled trial · Can J Physiol Pharmacol · 2002. Source record refreshed; an explanation has not been reviewed.
This page identifies the publication and its source. A checked explanation of its findings is not yet available.
Keep in mind: Checking bibliographic metadata does not verify a study’s conclusions or any advice previously linked to it.
Study details & source ↗Paper record
✓ ReadMeta-analysis · Br J Cancer · 2002. Source record refreshed; an explanation has not been reviewed.
This page identifies the publication and its source. A checked explanation of its findings is not yet available.
Keep in mind: Checking bibliographic metadata does not verify a study’s conclusions or any advice previously linked to it.
Study details & source ↗Paper record
✓ ReadMeta-analysis · Am J Ind Med · 2002. Source record refreshed; an explanation has not been reviewed.
This page identifies the publication and its source. A checked explanation of its findings is not yet available.
Keep in mind: Checking bibliographic metadata does not verify a study’s conclusions or any advice previously linked to it.
Study details & source ↗Paper record
✓ ReadRandomized controlled trial · Eur J Endocrinol · 2002. Source record refreshed; an explanation has not been reviewed.
This page identifies the publication and its source. A checked explanation of its findings is not yet available.
Keep in mind: Checking bibliographic metadata does not verify a study’s conclusions or any advice previously linked to it.
Study details & source ↗Paper record
✓ ReadRandomized controlled trial · Ter Arkh · 2002. Source record refreshed; an explanation has not been reviewed.
This page identifies the publication and its source. A checked explanation of its findings is not yet available.
Keep in mind: Checking bibliographic metadata does not verify a study’s conclusions or any advice previously linked to it.
Study details & source ↗Paper record
✓ ReadMeta-analysis · Am J Epidemiol · 2002. Source record refreshed; an explanation has not been reviewed.
This page identifies the publication and its source. A checked explanation of its findings is not yet available.
Keep in mind: Checking bibliographic metadata does not verify a study’s conclusions or any advice previously linked to it.
Study details & source ↗Paper record
✓ ReadMeta-analysis · Alcohol Res Health · 2001. Source record refreshed; an explanation has not been reviewed.
This page identifies the publication and its source. A checked explanation of its findings is not yet available.
Keep in mind: Checking bibliographic metadata does not verify a study’s conclusions or any advice previously linked to it.
Study details & source ↗Paper record
✓ ReadRandomized controlled trial · Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol · 2001. Source record refreshed; an explanation has not been reviewed.
This page identifies the publication and its source. A checked explanation of its findings is not yet available.
Keep in mind: Checking bibliographic metadata does not verify a study’s conclusions or any advice previously linked to it.
Study details & source ↗Paper record
✓ ReadMeta-analysis · Br J Cancer · 2001. Source record refreshed; an explanation has not been reviewed.
This page identifies the publication and its source. A checked explanation of its findings is not yet available.
Keep in mind: Checking bibliographic metadata does not verify a study’s conclusions or any advice previously linked to it.
Study details & source ↗Paper record
✓ ReadSystematic review · Cochrane Database Syst Rev · 2001. Source record refreshed; an explanation has not been reviewed.
This page identifies the publication and its source. A checked explanation of its findings is not yet available.
Keep in mind: Checking bibliographic metadata does not verify a study’s conclusions or any advice previously linked to it.
Study details & source ↗Paper record
✓ ReadRandomized controlled trial · Psychopharmacology (Berl) · 2001. Source record refreshed; an explanation has not been reviewed.
This page identifies the publication and its source. A checked explanation of its findings is not yet available.
Keep in mind: Checking bibliographic metadata does not verify a study’s conclusions or any advice previously linked to it.
Study details & source ↗Paper record
✓ ReadMeta-analysis · Am J Epidemiol · 2001. Source record refreshed; an explanation has not been reviewed.
This page identifies the publication and its source. A checked explanation of its findings is not yet available.
Keep in mind: Checking bibliographic metadata does not verify a study’s conclusions or any advice previously linked to it.
Study details & source ↗Paper record
✓ ReadRandomized controlled trial · J Nutr · 2001. Source record refreshed; an explanation has not been reviewed.
This page identifies the publication and its source. A checked explanation of its findings is not yet available.
Keep in mind: Checking bibliographic metadata does not verify a study’s conclusions or any advice previously linked to it.
Study details & source ↗Paper record
✓ ReadTry a broader word, or explore another topic.
Topics help you browse; they are not clinical recommendations. What our review labels mean ↗