A validation study found acceptable internal consistency and support for its questionnaire structure, without testing whether the measure predicts HIV infection or improves prevention.
Cross-sectional questionnaire development and validation study.2023
30-second takeaway ＋
The researchers developed a questionnaire intended to measure HIV-prevention behaviors in Thai men who have sex with men. Its items showed acceptable consistency, and its structure and correlations with other measures supported validity in the studied sample. These findings concern measurement quality; the study did not test an intervention or report effects on HIV transmission.
Keep in mind: Data were collected only once, so this abstract-based account cannot establish stability over time or responsiveness to behavioral change. Findings from this sample do not establish validity in younger people or other populations.
Study details & source ↗Abstract-based explanation
✓ Read
Randomized controlled trial · J Public Health Manag Pract · 2026. Source record refreshed; an explanation has not been reviewed.
Randomized controlled trial2026
About this paper ＋
This page identifies the publication and its source. A checked explanation of its findings is not yet available.
Keep in mind: Checking bibliographic metadata does not verify a study’s conclusions or any advice previously linked to it.
Study details & source ↗Paper record
✓ Read
Randomized controlled trial · J Aging Phys Act · 2026. Source record refreshed; an explanation has not been reviewed.
Randomized controlled trial2026
About this paper ＋
This page identifies the publication and its source. A checked explanation of its findings is not yet available.
Keep in mind: Checking bibliographic metadata does not verify a study’s conclusions or any advice previously linked to it.
Study details & source ↗Paper record
✓ Read
Randomized controlled trial · BMC Public Health · 2025. Source record refreshed; an explanation has not been reviewed.
Randomized controlled trial2025
About this paper ＋
This page identifies the publication and its source. A checked explanation of its findings is not yet available.
Keep in mind: Checking bibliographic metadata does not verify a study’s conclusions or any advice previously linked to it.
Study details & source ↗Paper record
✓ Read
Randomized controlled trial · Age Ageing · 2025. Source record refreshed; an explanation has not been reviewed.
Randomized controlled trial2025
About this paper ＋
This page identifies the publication and its source. A checked explanation of its findings is not yet available.
Keep in mind: Checking bibliographic metadata does not verify a study’s conclusions or any advice previously linked to it.
Study details & source ↗Paper record
✓ Read
Meta-analysis · Am J Epidemiol · 2025. Source record refreshed; an explanation has not been reviewed.
Meta-analysis2025
About this paper ＋
This page identifies the publication and its source. A checked explanation of its findings is not yet available.
Keep in mind: Checking bibliographic metadata does not verify a study’s conclusions or any advice previously linked to it.
Study details & source ↗Paper record
✓ Read
Meta-analysis · BMC Geriatr · 2025. Source record refreshed; an explanation has not been reviewed.
Meta-analysis2025
About this paper ＋
This page identifies the publication and its source. A checked explanation of its findings is not yet available.
Keep in mind: Checking bibliographic metadata does not verify a study’s conclusions or any advice previously linked to it.
Study details & source ↗Paper record
✓ Read
Randomized controlled trial · Explore (NY) · 2025. Source record refreshed; an explanation has not been reviewed.
Randomized controlled trial2025
About this paper ＋
This page identifies the publication and its source. A checked explanation of its findings is not yet available.
Keep in mind: Checking bibliographic metadata does not verify a study’s conclusions or any advice previously linked to it.
Study details & source ↗Paper record
✓ Read
Meta-analysis · BMC Psychiatry · 2025. Source record refreshed; an explanation has not been reviewed.
Meta-analysis2025
About this paper ＋
This page identifies the publication and its source. A checked explanation of its findings is not yet available.
Keep in mind: Checking bibliographic metadata does not verify a study’s conclusions or any advice previously linked to it.
Study details & source ↗Paper record
✓ Read
Systematic review · Front Nutr · 2025. Source record refreshed; an explanation has not been reviewed.
Systematic review2025
About this paper ＋
This page identifies the publication and its source. A checked explanation of its findings is not yet available.
Keep in mind: Checking bibliographic metadata does not verify a study’s conclusions or any advice previously linked to it.
Study details & source ↗Paper record
✓ Read
Meta-analysis · Transl Psychiatry · 2025. Source record refreshed; an explanation has not been reviewed.
Meta-analysis2025
About this paper ＋
This page identifies the publication and its source. A checked explanation of its findings is not yet available.
Keep in mind: Checking bibliographic metadata does not verify a study’s conclusions or any advice previously linked to it.
Study details & source ↗Paper record
✓ Read
Meta-analysis · Geriatr Nurs · 2025. Source record refreshed; an explanation has not been reviewed.
Meta-analysis2025
About this paper ＋
This page identifies the publication and its source. A checked explanation of its findings is not yet available.
Keep in mind: Checking bibliographic metadata does not verify a study’s conclusions or any advice previously linked to it.
Study details & source ↗Paper record
✓ Read
Meta-analysis · Arch Gerontol Geriatr · 2025. Source record refreshed; an explanation has not been reviewed.
Meta-analysis2025
About this paper ＋
This page identifies the publication and its source. A checked explanation of its findings is not yet available.
Keep in mind: Checking bibliographic metadata does not verify a study’s conclusions or any advice previously linked to it.
Study details & source ↗Paper record
✓ Read
Systematic review · Health Res Policy Syst · 2025. Source record refreshed; an explanation has not been reviewed.
Systematic review2025
About this paper ＋
This page identifies the publication and its source. A checked explanation of its findings is not yet available.
Keep in mind: Checking bibliographic metadata does not verify a study’s conclusions or any advice previously linked to it.
Study details & source ↗Paper record
✓ Read
Meta-analysis · BMC Psychiatry · 2025. Source record refreshed; an explanation has not been reviewed.
Meta-analysis2025
About this paper ＋
This page identifies the publication and its source. A checked explanation of its findings is not yet available.
Keep in mind: Checking bibliographic metadata does not verify a study’s conclusions or any advice previously linked to it.
Study details & source ↗Paper record
✓ Read
Meta-analysis · Syst Rev · 2025. Source record refreshed; an explanation has not been reviewed.
Meta-analysis2025
About this paper ＋
This page identifies the publication and its source. A checked explanation of its findings is not yet available.
Keep in mind: Checking bibliographic metadata does not verify a study’s conclusions or any advice previously linked to it.
Study details & source ↗Paper record
✓ Read
Meta-analysis · BMC Psychiatry · 2025. Source record refreshed; an explanation has not been reviewed.
Meta-analysis2025
About this paper ＋
This page identifies the publication and its source. A checked explanation of its findings is not yet available.
Keep in mind: Checking bibliographic metadata does not verify a study’s conclusions or any advice previously linked to it.
Study details & source ↗Paper record
✓ Read
Meta-analysis · Support Care Cancer · 2025. Source record refreshed; an explanation has not been reviewed.
Meta-analysis2025
About this paper ＋
This page identifies the publication and its source. A checked explanation of its findings is not yet available.
Keep in mind: Checking bibliographic metadata does not verify a study’s conclusions or any advice previously linked to it.
Study details & source ↗Paper record
✓ Read
Meta-analysis · Complement Ther Clin Pract · 2025. Source record refreshed; an explanation has not been reviewed.
Meta-analysis2025
About this paper ＋
This page identifies the publication and its source. A checked explanation of its findings is not yet available.
Keep in mind: Checking bibliographic metadata does not verify a study’s conclusions or any advice previously linked to it.
Study details & source ↗Paper record
✓ Read
Meta-analysis · Int Health · 2025. Source record refreshed; an explanation has not been reviewed.
Meta-analysis2025
About this paper ＋
This page identifies the publication and its source. A checked explanation of its findings is not yet available.
Keep in mind: Checking bibliographic metadata does not verify a study’s conclusions or any advice previously linked to it.
Study details & source ↗Paper record
✓ Read
Meta-analysis · Geriatr Nurs · 2025. Source record refreshed; an explanation has not been reviewed.
Meta-analysis2025
About this paper ＋
This page identifies the publication and its source. A checked explanation of its findings is not yet available.
Keep in mind: Checking bibliographic metadata does not verify a study’s conclusions or any advice previously linked to it.
Study details & source ↗Paper record
✓ Read
Meta-analysis · Epidemiol Psychiatr Sci · 2025. Source record refreshed; an explanation has not been reviewed.
Meta-analysis2025
About this paper ＋
This page identifies the publication and its source. A checked explanation of its findings is not yet available.
Keep in mind: Checking bibliographic metadata does not verify a study’s conclusions or any advice previously linked to it.
Study details & source ↗Paper record
✓ Read
Meta-analysis · BMC Public Health · 2025. Source record refreshed; an explanation has not been reviewed.
Meta-analysis2025
About this paper ＋
This page identifies the publication and its source. A checked explanation of its findings is not yet available.
Keep in mind: Checking bibliographic metadata does not verify a study’s conclusions or any advice previously linked to it.
Study details & source ↗Paper record
✓ Read
Cohort study (title) · Sci Rep · 2025. Source record refreshed; an explanation has not been reviewed.
Cohort study (title)2025
About this paper ＋
This page identifies the publication and its source. A checked explanation of its findings is not yet available.
Keep in mind: Checking bibliographic metadata does not verify a study’s conclusions or any advice previously linked to it.
Study details & source ↗Paper record
✓ Read