Review · Aviat Space Environ Med · 2000. Source record refreshed; an explanation has not been reviewed.
Review2000
About this paper ＋
This page identifies the publication and its source. A checked explanation of its findings is not yet available.
Keep in mind: Checking bibliographic metadata does not verify a study’s conclusions or any advice previously linked to it.
Study details & source ↗Paper record
✓ Read
Randomized controlled trial · Public Health Nurs · 2000. Source record refreshed; an explanation has not been reviewed.
Randomized controlled trial2000
About this paper ＋
This page identifies the publication and its source. A checked explanation of its findings is not yet available.
Keep in mind: Checking bibliographic metadata does not verify a study’s conclusions or any advice previously linked to it.
Study details & source ↗Paper record
✓ Read
Randomized controlled trial · Am J Phys Med Rehabil · 2000. Source record refreshed; an explanation has not been reviewed.
Randomized controlled trial2000
About this paper ＋
This page identifies the publication and its source. A checked explanation of its findings is not yet available.
Keep in mind: Checking bibliographic metadata does not verify a study’s conclusions or any advice previously linked to it.
Study details & source ↗Paper record
✓ Read
Clinical trial · J Aging Health · 1999. Source record refreshed; an explanation has not been reviewed.
Clinical trial1999
About this paper ＋
This page identifies the publication and its source. A checked explanation of its findings is not yet available.
Keep in mind: Checking bibliographic metadata does not verify a study’s conclusions or any advice previously linked to it.
Study details & source ↗Paper record
✓ Read
Clinical trial · J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci · 1999. Source record refreshed; an explanation has not been reviewed.
Clinical trial1999
About this paper ＋
This page identifies the publication and its source. A checked explanation of its findings is not yet available.
Keep in mind: Checking bibliographic metadata does not verify a study’s conclusions or any advice previously linked to it.
Study details & source ↗Paper record
✓ Read
Randomized controlled trial · Br J Psychiatry · 1999. Source record refreshed; an explanation has not been reviewed.
Randomized controlled trial1999
About this paper ＋
This page identifies the publication and its source. A checked explanation of its findings is not yet available.
Keep in mind: Checking bibliographic metadata does not verify a study’s conclusions or any advice previously linked to it.
Study details & source ↗Paper record
✓ Read
Randomized controlled trial · Br J Psychiatry · 1999. Source record refreshed; an explanation has not been reviewed.
Randomized controlled trial1999
About this paper ＋
This page identifies the publication and its source. A checked explanation of its findings is not yet available.
Keep in mind: Checking bibliographic metadata does not verify a study’s conclusions or any advice previously linked to it.
Study details & source ↗Paper record
✓ Read
Meta-analysis · J Pers · 1999. Source record refreshed; an explanation has not been reviewed.
Meta-analysis1999
About this paper ＋
This page identifies the publication and its source. A checked explanation of its findings is not yet available.
Keep in mind: Checking bibliographic metadata does not verify a study’s conclusions or any advice previously linked to it.
Study details & source ↗Paper record
✓ Read
Randomized controlled trial · Gerontologist · 1999. Source record refreshed; an explanation has not been reviewed.
Randomized controlled trial1999
About this paper ＋
This page identifies the publication and its source. A checked explanation of its findings is not yet available.
Keep in mind: Checking bibliographic metadata does not verify a study’s conclusions or any advice previously linked to it.
Study details & source ↗Paper record
✓ Read
Randomized controlled trial · Acta Ophthalmol Scand Suppl · 1998. Source record refreshed; an explanation has not been reviewed.
Randomized controlled trial1998
About this paper ＋
This page identifies the publication and its source. A checked explanation of its findings is not yet available.
Keep in mind: Checking bibliographic metadata does not verify a study’s conclusions or any advice previously linked to it.
Study details & source ↗Paper record
✓ Read
Study design not specified in the source record · Forsch Komplementarmed · 1998. Source record refreshed; an explanation has not been reviewed.
Study design not specified in the source record1998
About this paper ＋
This page identifies the publication and its source. A checked explanation of its findings is not yet available.
Keep in mind: Checking bibliographic metadata does not verify a study’s conclusions or any advice previously linked to it.
Study details & source ↗Paper record
✓ Read
Randomized controlled trial · Biol Psychol · 1998. Source record refreshed; an explanation has not been reviewed.
Randomized controlled trial1998
About this paper ＋
This page identifies the publication and its source. A checked explanation of its findings is not yet available.
Keep in mind: Checking bibliographic metadata does not verify a study’s conclusions or any advice previously linked to it.
Study details & source ↗Paper record
✓ Read
Randomized controlled trial · Pain · 1998. Source record refreshed; an explanation has not been reviewed.
Randomized controlled trial1998
About this paper ＋
This page identifies the publication and its source. A checked explanation of its findings is not yet available.
Keep in mind: Checking bibliographic metadata does not verify a study’s conclusions or any advice previously linked to it.
Study details & source ↗Paper record
✓ Read
Clinical trial · Aging (Milano) · 1997. Source record refreshed; an explanation has not been reviewed.
Clinical trial1997
About this paper ＋
This page identifies the publication and its source. A checked explanation of its findings is not yet available.
Keep in mind: Checking bibliographic metadata does not verify a study’s conclusions or any advice previously linked to it.
Study details & source ↗Paper record
✓ Read
Case-control study (title) · BMJ · 1997. Source record refreshed; an explanation has not been reviewed.
Case-control study (title)1997
About this paper ＋
This page identifies the publication and its source. A checked explanation of its findings is not yet available.
Keep in mind: Checking bibliographic metadata does not verify a study’s conclusions or any advice previously linked to it.
Study details & source ↗Paper record
✓ Read
Randomized controlled trial · Ophthalmology · 1996. Source record refreshed; an explanation has not been reviewed.
Randomized controlled trial1996
About this paper ＋
This page identifies the publication and its source. A checked explanation of its findings is not yet available.
Keep in mind: Checking bibliographic metadata does not verify a study’s conclusions or any advice previously linked to it.
Study details & source ↗Paper record
✓ Read
Randomized controlled trial · Eur J Ophthalmol · 1995. Source record refreshed; an explanation has not been reviewed.
Randomized controlled trial1995
About this paper ＋
This page identifies the publication and its source. A checked explanation of its findings is not yet available.
Keep in mind: Checking bibliographic metadata does not verify a study’s conclusions or any advice previously linked to it.
Study details & source ↗Paper record
✓ Read
Randomized controlled trial · Nurs Res · 1995. Source record refreshed; an explanation has not been reviewed.
Randomized controlled trial1995
About this paper ＋
This page identifies the publication and its source. A checked explanation of its findings is not yet available.
Keep in mind: Checking bibliographic metadata does not verify a study’s conclusions or any advice previously linked to it.
Study details & source ↗Paper record
✓ Read
Randomized controlled trial · Ophthalmologica · 1995. Source record refreshed; an explanation has not been reviewed.
Randomized controlled trial1995
About this paper ＋
This page identifies the publication and its source. A checked explanation of its findings is not yet available.
Keep in mind: Checking bibliographic metadata does not verify a study’s conclusions or any advice previously linked to it.
Study details & source ↗Paper record
✓ Read
Meta-analysis · Pain · 1995. Source record refreshed; an explanation has not been reviewed.
Meta-analysis1995
About this paper ＋
This page identifies the publication and its source. A checked explanation of its findings is not yet available.
Keep in mind: Checking bibliographic metadata does not verify a study’s conclusions or any advice previously linked to it.
Study details & source ↗Paper record
✓ Read
Clinical trial · Pharmacol Biochem Behav · 1994. Source record refreshed; an explanation has not been reviewed.
Clinical trial1994
About this paper ＋
This page identifies the publication and its source. A checked explanation of its findings is not yet available.
Keep in mind: Checking bibliographic metadata does not verify a study’s conclusions or any advice previously linked to it.
Study details & source ↗Paper record
✓ Read
Randomized controlled trial · Eye (Lond) · 1994. Source record refreshed; an explanation has not been reviewed.
Randomized controlled trial1994
About this paper ＋
This page identifies the publication and its source. A checked explanation of its findings is not yet available.
Keep in mind: Checking bibliographic metadata does not verify a study’s conclusions or any advice previously linked to it.
Study details & source ↗Paper record
✓ Read
Randomized controlled trial · Behav Res Ther · 1993. Source record refreshed; an explanation has not been reviewed.
Randomized controlled trial1993
About this paper ＋
This page identifies the publication and its source. A checked explanation of its findings is not yet available.
Keep in mind: Checking bibliographic metadata does not verify a study’s conclusions or any advice previously linked to it.
Study details & source ↗Paper record
✓ Read
Randomized controlled trial · Ophthalmology · 1993. Source record refreshed; an explanation has not been reviewed.
Randomized controlled trial1993
About this paper ＋
This page identifies the publication and its source. A checked explanation of its findings is not yet available.
Keep in mind: Checking bibliographic metadata does not verify a study’s conclusions or any advice previously linked to it.
Study details & source ↗Paper record
✓ Read