Randomized controlled trial · Acta Ophthalmol (Copenh) · 1993. Source record refreshed; an explanation has not been reviewed.
Randomized controlled trial1993
About this paper ＋
This page identifies the publication and its source. A checked explanation of its findings is not yet available.
Keep in mind: Checking bibliographic metadata does not verify a study’s conclusions or any advice previously linked to it.
Study details & source ↗Paper record
✓ Read
Randomized controlled trial · Br J Ophthalmol · 1993. Source record refreshed; an explanation has not been reviewed.
Randomized controlled trial1993
About this paper ＋
This page identifies the publication and its source. A checked explanation of its findings is not yet available.
Keep in mind: Checking bibliographic metadata does not verify a study’s conclusions or any advice previously linked to it.
Study details & source ↗Paper record
✓ Read
Randomized controlled trial · Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci · 1992. Source record refreshed; an explanation has not been reviewed.
Randomized controlled trial1992
About this paper ＋
This page identifies the publication and its source. A checked explanation of its findings is not yet available.
Keep in mind: Checking bibliographic metadata does not verify a study’s conclusions or any advice previously linked to it.
Study details & source ↗Paper record
✓ Read
Randomized controlled trial · Ophthalmology · 1991. Source record refreshed; an explanation has not been reviewed.
Randomized controlled trial1991
About this paper ＋
This page identifies the publication and its source. A checked explanation of its findings is not yet available.
Keep in mind: Checking bibliographic metadata does not verify a study’s conclusions or any advice previously linked to it.
Study details & source ↗Paper record
✓ Read
Randomized controlled trial · Int Ophthalmol · 1991. Source record refreshed; an explanation has not been reviewed.
Randomized controlled trial1991
About this paper ＋
This page identifies the publication and its source. A checked explanation of its findings is not yet available.
Keep in mind: Checking bibliographic metadata does not verify a study’s conclusions or any advice previously linked to it.
Study details & source ↗Paper record
✓ Read
Meta-analysis · J Consult Clin Psychol · 1991. Source record refreshed; an explanation has not been reviewed.
Meta-analysis1991
About this paper ＋
This page identifies the publication and its source. A checked explanation of its findings is not yet available.
Keep in mind: Checking bibliographic metadata does not verify a study’s conclusions or any advice previously linked to it.
Study details & source ↗Paper record
✓ Read
Study design not specified in the source record · Rev Roum Physiol (1990) · 1991. Source record refreshed; an explanation has not been reviewed.
Study design not specified in the source record1991
About this paper ＋
This page identifies the publication and its source. A checked explanation of its findings is not yet available.
Keep in mind: Checking bibliographic metadata does not verify a study’s conclusions or any advice previously linked to it.
Study details & source ↗Paper record
✓ Read
Randomized controlled trial · Psychol Rep · 1991. Source record refreshed; an explanation has not been reviewed.
Randomized controlled trial1991
About this paper ＋
This page identifies the publication and its source. A checked explanation of its findings is not yet available.
Keep in mind: Checking bibliographic metadata does not verify a study’s conclusions or any advice previously linked to it.
Study details & source ↗Paper record
✓ Read
Randomized controlled trial · Acta Ophthalmol (Copenh) · 1990. Source record refreshed; an explanation has not been reviewed.
Randomized controlled trial1990
About this paper ＋
This page identifies the publication and its source. A checked explanation of its findings is not yet available.
Keep in mind: Checking bibliographic metadata does not verify a study’s conclusions or any advice previously linked to it.
Study details & source ↗Paper record
✓ Read
Randomized controlled trial · Br J Ophthalmol · 1989. Source record refreshed; an explanation has not been reviewed.
Randomized controlled trial1989
About this paper ＋
This page identifies the publication and its source. A checked explanation of its findings is not yet available.
Keep in mind: Checking bibliographic metadata does not verify a study’s conclusions or any advice previously linked to it.
Study details & source ↗Paper record
✓ Read
Meta-analysis (title) · J Clin Psychol · 1989. Source record refreshed; an explanation has not been reviewed.
Meta-analysis (title)1989
About this paper ＋
This page identifies the publication and its source. A checked explanation of its findings is not yet available.
Keep in mind: Checking bibliographic metadata does not verify a study’s conclusions or any advice previously linked to it.
Study details & source ↗Paper record
✓ Read
Randomized controlled trial · J Behav Med · 1987. Source record refreshed; an explanation has not been reviewed.
Randomized controlled trial1987
About this paper ＋
This page identifies the publication and its source. A checked explanation of its findings is not yet available.
Keep in mind: Checking bibliographic metadata does not verify a study’s conclusions or any advice previously linked to it.
Study details & source ↗Paper record
✓ Read
Study design not specified in the source record · J Abnorm Psychol · 1986. Source record refreshed; an explanation has not been reviewed.
Study design not specified in the source record1986
About this paper ＋
This page identifies the publication and its source. A checked explanation of its findings is not yet available.
Keep in mind: Checking bibliographic metadata does not verify a study’s conclusions or any advice previously linked to it.
Study details & source ↗Paper record
✓ Read
Randomized controlled trial · Exp Eye Res · 1984. Source record refreshed; an explanation has not been reviewed.
Randomized controlled trial1984
About this paper ＋
This page identifies the publication and its source. A checked explanation of its findings is not yet available.
Keep in mind: Checking bibliographic metadata does not verify a study’s conclusions or any advice previously linked to it.
Study details & source ↗Paper record
✓ Read
Randomized controlled trial · J Nurs Educ · 1983. Source record refreshed; an explanation has not been reviewed.
Randomized controlled trial1983
About this paper ＋
This page identifies the publication and its source. A checked explanation of its findings is not yet available.
Keep in mind: Checking bibliographic metadata does not verify a study’s conclusions or any advice previously linked to it.
Study details & source ↗Paper record
✓ Read
Clinical trial · Acta Med Scand Suppl · 1982. Source record refreshed; an explanation has not been reviewed.
Clinical trial1982
About this paper ＋
This page identifies the publication and its source. A checked explanation of its findings is not yet available.
Keep in mind: Checking bibliographic metadata does not verify a study’s conclusions or any advice previously linked to it.
Study details & source ↗Paper record
✓ Read
Randomized controlled trial · Can J Ophthalmol · 1971. Source record refreshed; an explanation has not been reviewed.
Randomized controlled trial1971
About this paper ＋
This page identifies the publication and its source. A checked explanation of its findings is not yet available.
Keep in mind: Checking bibliographic metadata does not verify a study’s conclusions or any advice previously linked to it.
Study details & source ↗Paper record
✓ Read
The original reference could not be resolved. No study finding or advice is shown.
Study design unavailableYear unavailable
About this paper ＋
This PMID remains in the catalog so the unresolved reference is visible.
Keep in mind: Checking bibliographic metadata does not verify a study’s conclusions or any advice previously linked to it.
Study details & source ↗Source unresolved
✓ Read