Meta-analysis · Issues Compr Pediatr Nurs · 1998. Source record refreshed; an explanation has not been reviewed.
Meta-analysis1998
About this paper +
This page identifies the publication and its source. A checked explanation of its findings is not yet available.
Keep in mind: Checking bibliographic metadata does not verify a study’s conclusions or any advice previously linked to it.
Study details & source ↗
Paper record
✓ Read
Meta-analysis · Eur J Clin Nutr · 1998. Source record refreshed; an explanation has not been reviewed.
Meta-analysis1998
About this paper +
This page identifies the publication and its source. A checked explanation of its findings is not yet available.
Keep in mind: Checking bibliographic metadata does not verify a study’s conclusions or any advice previously linked to it.
Study details & source ↗
Paper record
✓ Read
Letter · Br J Gen Pract · 1997. Source record refreshed; an explanation has not been reviewed.
Letter1997
About this paper +
This page identifies the publication and its source. A checked explanation of its findings is not yet available.
Keep in mind: Checking bibliographic metadata does not verify a study’s conclusions or any advice previously linked to it.
Study details & source ↗
Paper record
✓ Read
Randomized controlled trial · Am J Clin Nutr · 1997. Source record refreshed; an explanation has not been reviewed.
Randomized controlled trial1997
About this paper +
This page identifies the publication and its source. A checked explanation of its findings is not yet available.
Keep in mind: Checking bibliographic metadata does not verify a study’s conclusions or any advice previously linked to it.
Study details & source ↗
Paper record
✓ Read
Randomized controlled trial · Int J Cardiol · 1996. Source record refreshed; an explanation has not been reviewed.
Randomized controlled trial1996
About this paper +
This page identifies the publication and its source. A checked explanation of its findings is not yet available.
Keep in mind: Checking bibliographic metadata does not verify a study’s conclusions or any advice previously linked to it.
Study details & source ↗
Paper record
✓ Read
Clinical trial · Eur J Appl Physiol Occup Physiol · 1996. Source record refreshed; an explanation has not been reviewed.
Clinical trial1996
About this paper +
This page identifies the publication and its source. A checked explanation of its findings is not yet available.
Keep in mind: Checking bibliographic metadata does not verify a study’s conclusions or any advice previously linked to it.
Study details & source ↗
Paper record
✓ Read
Randomized controlled trial · JPEN J Parenter Enteral Nutr · 1995. Source record refreshed; an explanation has not been reviewed.
Randomized controlled trial1995
About this paper +
This page identifies the publication and its source. A checked explanation of its findings is not yet available.
Keep in mind: Checking bibliographic metadata does not verify a study’s conclusions or any advice previously linked to it.
Study details & source ↗
Paper record
✓ Read
Randomized controlled trial · J Appl Physiol (1985) · 1995. Source record refreshed; an explanation has not been reviewed.
Randomized controlled trial1995
About this paper +
This page identifies the publication and its source. A checked explanation of its findings is not yet available.
Keep in mind: Checking bibliographic metadata does not verify a study’s conclusions or any advice previously linked to it.
Study details & source ↗
Paper record
✓ Read
Randomized controlled trial · J Ocul Pharmacol Ther · 1995. Source record refreshed; an explanation has not been reviewed.
Randomized controlled trial1995
About this paper +
This page identifies the publication and its source. A checked explanation of its findings is not yet available.
Keep in mind: Checking bibliographic metadata does not verify a study’s conclusions or any advice previously linked to it.
Study details & source ↗
Paper record
✓ Read
Randomized controlled trial · J Hypertens · 1995. Source record refreshed; an explanation has not been reviewed.
Randomized controlled trial1995
About this paper +
This page identifies the publication and its source. A checked explanation of its findings is not yet available.
Keep in mind: Checking bibliographic metadata does not verify a study’s conclusions or any advice previously linked to it.
Study details & source ↗
Paper record
✓ Read
Randomized controlled trial · Ann Epidemiol · 1995. Source record refreshed; an explanation has not been reviewed.
Randomized controlled trial1995
About this paper +
This page identifies the publication and its source. A checked explanation of its findings is not yet available.
Keep in mind: Checking bibliographic metadata does not verify a study’s conclusions or any advice previously linked to it.
Study details & source ↗
Paper record
✓ Read
Meta-analysis · J Hypertens · 1994. Source record refreshed; an explanation has not been reviewed.
Meta-analysis1994
About this paper +
This page identifies the publication and its source. A checked explanation of its findings is not yet available.
Keep in mind: Checking bibliographic metadata does not verify a study’s conclusions or any advice previously linked to it.
Study details & source ↗
Paper record
✓ Read
Randomized controlled trial · Am J Clin Nutr · 1994. Source record refreshed; an explanation has not been reviewed.
Randomized controlled trial1994
About this paper +
This page identifies the publication and its source. A checked explanation of its findings is not yet available.
Keep in mind: Checking bibliographic metadata does not verify a study’s conclusions or any advice previously linked to it.
Study details & source ↗
Paper record
✓ Read
Clinical trial · Aging (Milano) · 1994. Source record refreshed; an explanation has not been reviewed.
Clinical trial1994
About this paper +
This page identifies the publication and its source. A checked explanation of its findings is not yet available.
Keep in mind: Checking bibliographic metadata does not verify a study’s conclusions or any advice previously linked to it.
Study details & source ↗
Paper record
✓ Read
Randomized controlled trial · Eur J Appl Physiol Occup Physiol · 1994. Source record refreshed; an explanation has not been reviewed.
Randomized controlled trial1994
About this paper +
This page identifies the publication and its source. A checked explanation of its findings is not yet available.
Keep in mind: Checking bibliographic metadata does not verify a study’s conclusions or any advice previously linked to it.
Study details & source ↗
Paper record
✓ Read
Randomized controlled trial · Magnes Res · 1994. Source record refreshed; an explanation has not been reviewed.
Randomized controlled trial1994
About this paper +
This page identifies the publication and its source. A checked explanation of its findings is not yet available.
Keep in mind: Checking bibliographic metadata does not verify a study’s conclusions or any advice previously linked to it.
Study details & source ↗
Paper record
✓ Read
Randomized controlled trial · Schriftenr Ver Wasser Boden Lufthyg · 1993. Source record refreshed; an explanation has not been reviewed.
Randomized controlled trial1993
About this paper +
This page identifies the publication and its source. A checked explanation of its findings is not yet available.
Keep in mind: Checking bibliographic metadata does not verify a study’s conclusions or any advice previously linked to it.
Study details & source ↗
Paper record
✓ Read
Randomized controlled trial · Am J Hypertens · 1993. Source record refreshed; an explanation has not been reviewed.
Randomized controlled trial1993
About this paper +
This page identifies the publication and its source. A checked explanation of its findings is not yet available.
Keep in mind: Checking bibliographic metadata does not verify a study’s conclusions or any advice previously linked to it.
Study details & source ↗
Paper record
✓ Read
Randomized controlled trial · BMJ · 1993. Source record refreshed; an explanation has not been reviewed.
Randomized controlled trial1993
About this paper +
This page identifies the publication and its source. A checked explanation of its findings is not yet available.
Keep in mind: Checking bibliographic metadata does not verify a study’s conclusions or any advice previously linked to it.
Study details & source ↗
Paper record
✓ Read
Randomized controlled trial · JAMA · 1992. Source record refreshed; an explanation has not been reviewed.
Randomized controlled trial1992
About this paper +
This page identifies the publication and its source. A checked explanation of its findings is not yet available.
Keep in mind: Checking bibliographic metadata does not verify a study’s conclusions or any advice previously linked to it.
Study details & source ↗
Paper record
✓ Read
Randomized controlled trial · Am J Crit Care · 1992. Source record refreshed; an explanation has not been reviewed.
Randomized controlled trial1992
About this paper +
This page identifies the publication and its source. A checked explanation of its findings is not yet available.
Keep in mind: Checking bibliographic metadata does not verify a study’s conclusions or any advice previously linked to it.
Study details & source ↗
Paper record
✓ Read
Randomized controlled trial · Am J Clin Nutr · 1991. Source record refreshed; an explanation has not been reviewed.
Randomized controlled trial1991
About this paper +
This page identifies the publication and its source. A checked explanation of its findings is not yet available.
Keep in mind: Checking bibliographic metadata does not verify a study’s conclusions or any advice previously linked to it.
Study details & source ↗
Paper record
✓ Read
Randomized controlled trial · Am J Hypertens · 1991. Source record refreshed; an explanation has not been reviewed.
Randomized controlled trial1991
About this paper +
This page identifies the publication and its source. A checked explanation of its findings is not yet available.
Keep in mind: Checking bibliographic metadata does not verify a study’s conclusions or any advice previously linked to it.
Study details & source ↗
Paper record
✓ Read
Clinical trial · Angiology · 1991. Source record refreshed; an explanation has not been reviewed.
Clinical trial1991
About this paper +
This page identifies the publication and its source. A checked explanation of its findings is not yet available.
Keep in mind: Checking bibliographic metadata does not verify a study’s conclusions or any advice previously linked to it.
Study details & source ↗
Paper record
✓ Read