Randomized controlled trial · J Nurs Educ · 1983. Source record refreshed; an explanation has not been reviewed.
Randomized controlled trial1983
About this paper ＋
This page identifies the publication and its source. A checked explanation of its findings is not yet available.
Keep in mind: Checking bibliographic metadata does not verify a study’s conclusions or any advice previously linked to it.
Study details & source ↗Paper record
✓ Read
Randomized controlled trial · Hypertension · 1982. Source record refreshed; an explanation has not been reviewed.
Randomized controlled trial1982
About this paper ＋
This page identifies the publication and its source. A checked explanation of its findings is not yet available.
Keep in mind: Checking bibliographic metadata does not verify a study’s conclusions or any advice previously linked to it.
Study details & source ↗Paper record
✓ Read
Clinical trial · Acta Med Scand Suppl · 1982. Source record refreshed; an explanation has not been reviewed.
Clinical trial1982
About this paper ＋
This page identifies the publication and its source. A checked explanation of its findings is not yet available.
Keep in mind: Checking bibliographic metadata does not verify a study’s conclusions or any advice previously linked to it.
Study details & source ↗Paper record
✓ Read
Randomized controlled trial · Am J Clin Nutr · 1981. Source record refreshed; an explanation has not been reviewed.
Randomized controlled trial1981
About this paper ＋
This page identifies the publication and its source. A checked explanation of its findings is not yet available.
Keep in mind: Checking bibliographic metadata does not verify a study’s conclusions or any advice previously linked to it.
Study details & source ↗Paper record
✓ Read
Clinical trial · Aviat Space Environ Med · 1981. Source record refreshed; an explanation has not been reviewed.
Clinical trial1981
About this paper ＋
This page identifies the publication and its source. A checked explanation of its findings is not yet available.
Keep in mind: Checking bibliographic metadata does not verify a study’s conclusions or any advice previously linked to it.
Study details & source ↗Paper record
✓ Read
Randomized controlled trial · Psychopharmacology (Berl) · 1978. Source record refreshed; an explanation has not been reviewed.
Randomized controlled trial1978
About this paper ＋
This page identifies the publication and its source. A checked explanation of its findings is not yet available.
Keep in mind: Checking bibliographic metadata does not verify a study’s conclusions or any advice previously linked to it.
Study details & source ↗Paper record
✓ Read
Randomized controlled trial · Atherosclerosis · 1975. Source record refreshed; an explanation has not been reviewed.
Randomized controlled trial1975
About this paper ＋
This page identifies the publication and its source. A checked explanation of its findings is not yet available.
Keep in mind: Checking bibliographic metadata does not verify a study’s conclusions or any advice previously linked to it.
Study details & source ↗Paper record
✓ Read
Clinical trial · Arch Gen Psychiatry · 1975. Source record refreshed; an explanation has not been reviewed.
Clinical trial1975
About this paper ＋
This page identifies the publication and its source. A checked explanation of its findings is not yet available.
Keep in mind: Checking bibliographic metadata does not verify a study’s conclusions or any advice previously linked to it.
Study details & source ↗Paper record
✓ Read
Randomized controlled trial · Can J Ophthalmol · 1971. Source record refreshed; an explanation has not been reviewed.
Randomized controlled trial1971
About this paper ＋
This page identifies the publication and its source. A checked explanation of its findings is not yet available.
Keep in mind: Checking bibliographic metadata does not verify a study’s conclusions or any advice previously linked to it.
Study details & source ↗Paper record
✓ Read
Study design not specified in the source record · Acta Odontol Scand · 1953. Source record refreshed; an explanation has not been reviewed.
Study design not specified in the source record1953
About this paper ＋
This page identifies the publication and its source. A checked explanation of its findings is not yet available.
Keep in mind: Checking bibliographic metadata does not verify a study’s conclusions or any advice previously linked to it.
Study details & source ↗Paper record
✓ Read
The original reference could not be resolved. No study finding or advice is shown.
Study design unavailableYear unavailable
About this paper ＋
This PMID remains in the catalog so the unresolved reference is visible.
Keep in mind: Checking bibliographic metadata does not verify a study’s conclusions or any advice previously linked to it.
Study details & source ↗Source unresolved
✓ Read
The original reference could not be resolved. No study finding or advice is shown.
Study design unavailableYear unavailable
About this paper ＋
This PMID remains in the catalog so the unresolved reference is visible.
Keep in mind: Checking bibliographic metadata does not verify a study’s conclusions or any advice previously linked to it.
Study details & source ↗Source unresolved
✓ Read